26 Feb 2006

Should We Prosecute Sedition?

, ,

Ben Shapiro listened to Al Gore’s wild accusations, made in a speech in Saudi Arabia, alleging that the US had comitted atrocities against Arabs, and wondered why, in time of war, this kind of activity is not prosecuted.

At some point, opposition must be considered disloyal. At some point, the American people must say “enough.” At some point, Republicans in Congress must stop delicately tiptoeing with regard to sedition and must pass legislation to prosecute such sedition.

“Freedom of speech!” the American Civil Liberties Union will protest. Before we buy into the slogan, we must remember our history. President Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus and allowed governmental officials to arrest Rep. Clement Vallandigham after Vallandigham called the Civil War “cruel” and “wicked,” shut down hundreds of opposition newspapers, and had members of the Maryland legislature placed in prison to prevent Maryland’s secession. The Union won the Civil War.

Under the Espionage Act of 1917, opponents of World War I were routinely prosecuted, and the Supreme Court routinely upheld their convictions. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes rightly wrote, “When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.” The Allies won World War I.

During World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the internment of hundreds of thousands of Japanese-Americans, as well as allowing the prosecution and/or deportation of those who opposed the war. The Allies won World War II…

This is not to argue that every measure taken by the government to prosecute opponents of American wars is just or right or Constitutional. Some restrictions, however, are just and right and Constitutional — and necessary. No war can be won when members of a disloyal opposition are given free reign to undermine it.

StumbleUpon.com
2 Feedbacks on "Should We Prosecute Sedition?"

pat

ARE YOU CRAZY!!! THAT WOULD BE A THINLY VEILED ATTEMPT TO SQUASH OPPOSITION AND HAVE COMPLETE POWER.THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE .THIS IS WHY OUR CONNTRY IS GREAT.IT ISW SET UP SO IMPERIAL POWER GRABS BY THE LIKES OF BUSH ARE HELD IN CHECK



george Gallo

And this week we had to listen to Jim Moron (Virginia Representative) tell the Arab news service that the Dems got routed in the midterm elections because the T.E.A. party faction resents the mulatto in the White House for his mulatism. Actually, he didn’t seem to fathom that BHO is not truly “a black man”, but Moran is given an audience for his inane but seditious brainfarts anyway.



Comments

Please Leave a Comment!




Please note: Comments may be moderated. It may take a while for them to show on the page.






















Feeds
Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)
Feed Shark