Comments on: Environmental Magazine Wants Nuremburg Trials for Global Warming Deniers http://neveryetmelted.com/2006/10/12/environmental-magazine-wants-nuremburg-trials-for-global-warming-deniers/ The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. -- D.H. Lawrence Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:59 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: openeyed http://neveryetmelted.com/2006/10/12/environmental-magazine-wants-nuremburg-trials-for-global-warming-deniers/comment-page-1/#comment-107442 openeyed Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:48:24 +0000 http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=1710#comment-107442 global warming “denial industry.” why put it in quotes it exists. paid for by exxon-mobil. they used to work for rjreynolds. but hey smoking isnt bad for you is it? "Roberts and the other goofball, tree-hugging, Luddite moonbats are correct about the science" its not whether they are right its whether the scientist are, of the almost 300 major peer reviewed papers on climate change there has not been a single dissent from the fact that climate change is happening and is caused by humans. these deniers are having a major impact on the pace and scope off eventual action that the world will take. the recent UN ipcc report was highly conservative in its aproach including only facts that met absurd levels of proof. this was done so the denial lobby would get no chance to attck them. if indeed the scientist had been allowed to publish what is agreed on in their community the outlook would be much worse, and we would not be left with targets that ensure that millions of people will die. so then when it does happen why should these professional liars not be held accountable global warming “denial industry.”
why put it in quotes it exists. paid for by exxon-mobil. they used to work for rjreynolds. but hey smoking isnt bad for you is it?

“Roberts and the other goofball, tree-hugging, Luddite moonbats are correct about the science”

its not whether they are right its whether the scientist are, of the almost 300 major peer reviewed papers on climate change there has not been a single dissent from the fact that climate change is happening and is caused by humans.

these deniers are having a major impact on the pace and scope off eventual action that the world will take. the recent UN ipcc report was highly conservative in its aproach including only facts that met absurd levels of proof. this was done so the denial lobby would get no chance to attck them. if indeed the scientist had been allowed to publish what is agreed on in their community the outlook would be much worse, and we would not be left with targets that ensure that millions of people will die.

so then when it does happen why should these professional liars not be held accountable

]]>