http://neveryetmelted.com/2007/03/31/fox-news-special-report-socks-scissors-paper-the-sandy-berger-caper/ The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. -- D.H. Lawrence Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:06:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://neveryetmelted.com/2007/03/31/fox-news-special-report-socks-scissors-paper-the-sandy-berger-caper/comment-page-1/#comment-106028 Bill Ware Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:02:57 +0000 http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=2370#comment-106028 It is obvious that there was a trade. The Bush Whitehouse wanted to protect Ms Rice, so they gave the Clinton gang some protection as part of the deal. It is obvious that there was a trade. The Bush Whitehouse wanted to protect Ms Rice, so they gave the Clinton gang some protection as part of the deal.

]]> http://neveryetmelted.com/2007/03/31/fox-news-special-report-socks-scissors-paper-the-sandy-berger-caper/comment-page-1/#comment-106027 Bill Ware Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:59:18 +0000 http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=2370#comment-106027 First, this webpage is bizarre. I have no idea if this is the right place to make this comment. I was invited at the end of the "Berger piece" to make a comment. First I am sympathetic with the program, but the program was confusing in the context of what my memory was about the issues. I recall that the press had reported at the time of the first controversy, right or wrong, that Berger had only taken copies of the documents. If this is not right then the program should have built upon what the common memory might have been - assuming mine has a significant percentage of the audience. Second, you did not make it totally clear when Berger took away from the examination rooom "his notes made at the time" or the archive documents or his notes in the archive. Or better, it was not clear as to when it could be proven without a doubt that he had taken archive documents, in distinct form when he could have taken archive documents. At the end you should have graphically illustrated exactly precisely what was taken or what he did was known to wrong. You should show all the possible permutations, then what is provable, what is likely, and what is possible. Otherwise a good program. First, this webpage is bizarre. I have no idea if this is the right place to make this comment. I was invited at the end of the “Berger piece” to make a comment. First I am sympathetic with the program, but the program was confusing in the context of what my memory was about the issues. I recall that the press had reported at the time of the first controversy, right or wrong, that Berger had only taken copies of the documents. If this is not right then the program should have built upon what the common memory might have been – assuming mine has a significant percentage of the audience. Second, you did not make it totally clear when Berger took away from the examination rooom “his notes made at the time” or the archive documents or his notes in the archive. Or better, it was not clear as to when it could be proven without a doubt that he had taken archive documents, in distinct form when he could have taken archive documents. At the end you should have graphically illustrated exactly precisely what was taken or what he did was known to wrong. You should show all the possible permutations, then what is provable, what is likely, and what is possible. Otherwise a good program.

]]>