<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS To Consider Hearing Another Obama Citizenship Suit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neveryetmelted.com/2008/12/10/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2008/12/10/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/</link>
	<description>The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. -- D.H. Lawrence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Auer</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2008/12/10/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-135360</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Auer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/index.php/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/#comment-135360</guid>
		<description>If &quot;real&quot; proof is not needed to become President of the United States, why not have an illegal alien serve in the cabinet? Why would a person spend 800,000$ to seal his records? Is this the kind of President we need in a budgetary crisis? Why would a president leave this up for citizens to debate? This is media&#039;s strategy for questions by citizens they do not wish answered.
1) Keep the question out of mainstream media
2) Make the question absurd to ask
3) Depend on the popularity of the person to make the question a &quot;who cares&quot; answer.
4) The question fades away or it becomes too late for an answer/result.
This is media&#039;s new-found way of dealing with &quot;troublesome&quot; questions. It is not the question that is wrong to ask, it is the answer that is the problem.
BREAL
Shawn Auer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8220;real&#8221; proof is not needed to become President of the United States, why not have an illegal alien serve in the cabinet? Why would a person spend 800,000$ to seal his records? Is this the kind of President we need in a budgetary crisis? Why would a president leave this up for citizens to debate? This is media&#8217;s strategy for questions by citizens they do not wish answered.<br />
1) Keep the question out of mainstream media<br />
2) Make the question absurd to ask<br />
3) Depend on the popularity of the person to make the question a &#8220;who cares&#8221; answer.<br />
4) The question fades away or it becomes too late for an answer/result.<br />
This is media&#8217;s new-found way of dealing with &#8220;troublesome&#8221; questions. It is not the question that is wrong to ask, it is the answer that is the problem.<br />
<span class="caps">BREAL</span><br />
Shawn Auer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2008/12/10/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-134967</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/index.php/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/#comment-134967</guid>
		<description>Good comment by Glenda. The average citizen has to undergo more vetting when he applies for a drivers license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment by Glenda. The average citizen has to undergo more vetting when he applies for a drivers license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2008/12/10/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-134966</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/index.php/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/#comment-134966</guid>
		<description>Good comment by Glenda and also true. The average citizen has to undergo more vetting when applies for a drivers license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment by Glenda and also true. The average citizen has to undergo more vetting when applies for a drivers license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenda</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2008/12/10/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-134273</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/index.php/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/#comment-134273</guid>
		<description>So if a person believes that the govt is above corruption, then that makes them a kook ?  But when an elected official, OUR EMPLOYEE wants , he can refuse to provide documents that are required by OUR CONSTITUTION to hold the highest office and that is supposed to be acceptable ??  What is wrong with this picture ??  But yet the SCOTUS has the nerve to not uphold our rights and make reference to the Bush/Gore case.  They should all be dismissed. They are either too wealthy, too lazy, or too senile...possibly all of the afore mentined.  If this is not upheld, then why as an American citizen should I have to pay taxes or obey any laws ?  Then just refuse any information and join a Chicago Mafia gang and all will be cool.  Is that the way it works ?  No one should be subject to a background check for employment if he doesn&#039;t have to prove his citizenship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if a person believes that the govt is above corruption, then that makes them a kook ?  But when an elected official, <span class="caps">OUR EMPLOYEE</span> wants , he can refuse to provide documents that are required by <span class="caps">OUR CONSTITUTION</span> to hold the highest office and that is supposed to be acceptable ??  What is wrong with this picture ??  But yet the <span class="caps">SCOTUS</span> has the nerve to not uphold our rights and make reference to the Bush/Gore case.  They should all be dismissed. They are either too wealthy, too lazy, or too senile&#8230;possibly all of the afore mentined.  If this is not upheld, then why as an American citizen should I have to pay taxes or obey any laws ?  Then just refuse any information and join a Chicago Mafia gang and all will be cool.  Is that the way it works ?  No one should be subject to a background check for employment if he doesn&#8217;t have to prove his citizenship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nostate.com blogger renounces American citizenship, becomes stateless person &#124; No Treason</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2008/12/10/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-134228</link>
		<dc:creator>Nostate.com blogger renounces American citizenship, becomes stateless person &#124; No Treason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/index.php/scotus-to-consider-hearing-another-obama-citizenship-suit/#comment-134228</guid>
		<description>[...] Never Yet Melted » SCOTUS To Consider Hearing Another Obama &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Never Yet Melted &#187; <span class="caps">SCOTUS </span>To Consider Hearing Another Obama &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

