<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;What Side of History Do You Want To Be On?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/11/08/what-side-of-history-do-you-want-to-be-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/11/08/what-side-of-history-do-you-want-to-be-on/</link>
	<description>The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. -- D.H. Lawrence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:39:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baculus</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/11/08/what-side-of-history-do-you-want-to-be-on/comment-page-1/#comment-165485</link>
		<dc:creator>Baculus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 04:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=7706#comment-165485</guid>
		<description>Even though this comment is long after your blog article was posted, I believe you have misunderstood Bismarck&#039;s quote.  Bismarck opposed socialism, and he feared that state socialism will eventually come into existence if it was not headed off by some measures.  His health and social policies were meant to draw the working class away from the socialists, not to create a state socialist society.   After all, Bismarck was a conservative, and a pragmatic (and sometimes obstinate) one at that.  And not only that, but he wanted to crush the socialists (and after anti-socialist laws were passed in Germany).

Of course, to him, state power lied in the monarchy.  If anything, Germany needed to be liberalized in the second half of the 19th century.

As far as the American Democrat&#039;s are concerned, their reforms are capitalist in nature.  They&#039;re nothing like, say, the Canadian or U.K. systems.  The Democrat&#039;s reform does not socialized the American health care industry, nor does it establish a single-payer system. It really has some pretty modest measures, and considering your claims that these health reform measures will lead to some collectivist entity, the reforms aren&#039;t too popular on the left.  Go to any (REAL) left-wing site, and aren&#039;t thrilled at all.  

(By the way, I don&#039;t think most American right-wingers actually knows what a real radical left-winger, as opposite to a left-of-center moderate, looks or sounds like.)

And seeing how your politics appear to lie on the political right, it&#039;s strange to hear you talk about liberalism, especially since American conservatives have done their best to demonize this ideology which lies at the roots of America.  Conservatives draw no distinction between social and economic liberals.  No, that isn&#039;t enough.  ALL liberals are evil, as pronounced by the Right, even if American conservatives have glommed onto some Age of Enlighten liberal ideals.  (And without fully understanding them, in my opinion.)

Anyway, if you have made it this far, thanks for listening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though this comment is long after your blog article was posted, I believe you have misunderstood Bismarck&#8217;s quote.  Bismarck opposed socialism, and he feared that state socialism will eventually come into existence if it was not headed off by some measures.  His health and social policies were meant to draw the working class away from the socialists, not to create a state socialist society.   After all, Bismarck was a conservative, and a pragmatic (and sometimes obstinate) one at that.  And not only that, but he wanted to crush the socialists (and after anti-socialist laws were passed in Germany).</p>
<p>Of course, to him, state power lied in the monarchy.  If anything, Germany needed to be liberalized in the second half of the 19th century.</p>
<p>As far as the American Democrat&#8217;s are concerned, their reforms are capitalist in nature.  They&#8217;re nothing like, say, the Canadian or U.K. systems.  The Democrat&#8217;s reform does not socialized the American health care industry, nor does it establish a single-payer system. It really has some pretty modest measures, and considering your claims that these health reform measures will lead to some collectivist entity, the reforms aren&#8217;t too popular on the left.  Go to any (REAL) left-wing site, and aren&#8217;t thrilled at all.</p>
<p>(By the way, I don&#8217;t think most American right-wingers actually knows what a real radical left-winger, as opposite to a left-of-center moderate, looks or sounds like.)</p>
<p>And seeing how your politics appear to lie on the political right, it&#8217;s strange to hear you talk about liberalism, especially since American conservatives have done their best to demonize this ideology which lies at the roots of America.  Conservatives draw no distinction between social and economic liberals.  No, that isn&#8217;t enough.  <span class="caps">ALL</span> liberals are evil, as pronounced by the Right, even if American conservatives have glommed onto some Age of Enlighten liberal ideals.  (And without fully understanding them, in my opinion.)</p>
<p>Anyway, if you have made it this far, thanks for listening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillclimber</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/11/08/what-side-of-history-do-you-want-to-be-on/comment-page-1/#comment-148778</link>
		<dc:creator>hillclimber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=7706#comment-148778</guid>
		<description>In spite of all of history as a example, we have chosen a significant number of radical leftist leaders that are determined to &quot;level the global playing field&quot; by restructuring our entire economic model. And our voices are ignored by these elected officials. Term limits now. retroactive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spite of all of history as a example, we have chosen a significant number of radical leftist leaders that are determined to &#8220;level the global playing field&#8221; by restructuring our entire economic model. And our voices are ignored by these elected officials. Term limits now. retroactive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/11/08/what-side-of-history-do-you-want-to-be-on/comment-page-1/#comment-148773</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=7706#comment-148773</guid>
		<description>Did you ever get that right, JDZ!
A significant part of modern American Liberalism that is not hereditary is prestige-seeking. When illuminati from Dan Rather to Cher to George Clooney to Roseann all enthusiastically endorse something, why, we all just want to get on board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever get that right, <span class="caps">JDZ</span>!<br />
A significant part of modern American Liberalism that is not hereditary is prestige-seeking. When illuminati from Dan Rather to Cher to George Clooney to Roseann all enthusiastically endorse something, why, we all just want to get on board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

