<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Never Yet Melted &#187; Myers-Armstrong v. Actavis Totowa LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neveryetmelted.com/categories/myers-armstrong-v-actavis-totowa-llc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neveryetmelted.com</link>
	<description>The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. -- D.H. Lawrence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trial Lawyer Setback</title>
		<link>http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/05/09/trial-lawyer-setback/</link>
		<comments>http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/05/09/trial-lawyer-setback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JDZ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myers-Armstrong v. Actavis Totowa LLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=5764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter Olson forwarded this news item from Drug and Device Law, noting that, even in California, some spoilsport judges won&#8217;t let you sue if a product actually works and does not harm you. [T]he defendant was basically shut down by the FDA over Good Manufacturing Practices issues at its plant. The defendant recalled over 100 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://twitter.com/walterolson">Walter Olson</a> forwarded this news item from <a href="http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/2009/05/strike-suit-strikes-out.html">Drug and Device Law</a>, noting that, even in California, some spoilsport judges won&#8217;t let you sue if a product actually works and does not harm you.</p>

	<p><blockquote><br />
[T]he defendant was basically shut down by the <span class="caps">FDA</span> over Good Manufacturing Practices issues at its plant. The defendant recalled over 100 drugs (it was a generic manufacturer) at the wholesale, but not retail level. The plaintiff took one of these drugs, was not hurt by it, but sued over all 100+ drugs. ...</p>

	<p>The court threw it out on the eminently sensible ground that a plaintiff who took a drug that was effective, and wasn&#8217;t hurt by it, hasn&#8217;t been injured just by the drug being &#8220;adulterated&#8221; under the <span class="caps">FDCA</span> because there were <span class="caps">GMP</span> violations at the plant where it was made. The court literally concluded that &#8220;life&#8217;s too short&#8221; to allow this kind of 100% opportunistic litigation.</blockquote></p>


 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/05/09/trial-lawyer-setback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

