Joe Katzman explains why Trump’s inartful and commonly inaccurate debating technique seems to be working so well.
The right attempts political persuasion. The left, on the other hand, attempts social persuasion — basically seizing the commanding heights of culture-making institutions and then deciding that espousing some political claims (being pro-gay-marriage) increase social status and that espousing other political claims (being against gay marriage) decrease social status and, indeed, make one a social pariah, fit for ostracism, mass mockery, and internal exile.
The left’s method works much better than the right’s. It always has and it always will. Because most people don’t care about politics all that much — but nearly everyone (except for the crankiest of contrarians, including some of the current assembled company) cares about their social status.
Having higher social status gets you invites to the Cocktail Party Circuit, which is a real thing, defined broadly (and metaphorically) enough. It makes you datable, it makes you “clubbable,” as the old term went.
It can get you promoted at work, particularly if the sort of job you do is a bit vague as far as definite, tangible outputs and thus advancement depends more on how upper management feels about you.
While the left wing continues winning arguments by not even having arguments at all, instead simply demonizing those who espouse any contrary position, the #SmartSet (citation required) of the establishment right continues believing, apparently earnestly and definitely ridiculously, that if they just out argue their political competitors, they’ll change minds.
They won’t. Or not enough to actually matter. Because most people don’t really care enough about these issues to really engage with them on an intellectual level; they just want to know what to claim to believe so that other people won’t think they’re weird, and deem them unfriendable, undatable, and poor candidates for promotion inside The Corporation.
Trump’s manner of engaging with The Blob of left-wing virtue-signalling and status-conferring is to attempt to degrade the left wing cultural Borg of its own social status, thereby reducing its ability to set tastes, serve as “gatekeepers” of what the right-minded people agree are proper attitudes and beliefs, and demonize dissenters.
This is often ugly — but that’s how the sausage gets made.
HT: Glenn Reynolds.
![StumbleUpon.com](http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/badgeStumble.png)
Seattle Sam
Exhibit A: Oprah Winfrey.
Suddenly a person who has no known policy positions is deemed the frontrunner for the Democrat nomination. Solely because she is an engaging personality who gives away free stuff to people.
But can you really blame Democrats? Almost all of their real policy positions — higher taxes, slower growth, open borders, amnesty for illegals, a weaker military, government run healthcare — are decidedly unpopular.
Spurt Reynolds
I hope the dems keep going left and shrink their party for the next 20 years.
Conservatives will need at least that much time to bring the country back to normal.
Please Leave a Comment!