Alan Nathan compares the MSM’s coverage of Sandy Berger’s theft and destruction of documents from the National Archives to the media’s treatment of Watergate (which brought down a sitting president) and asks (not unreasonably):
Why is robbing national security documents less important than robbing campaign documents?
![StumbleUpon.com](http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/badgeStumble.png)
Please Leave a Comment!