David Kahane, at National Review, observes signs of a double-standard flourishing in the ultra-affluent communities of the Hollywood elite.
I was driving through Beverly Hills yesterday, on my way out to Malibu, and the signs in the yards caught my eye.
Not the â€œFor Saleâ€ signs. …
No, the other signs. You know, the ones that say â€œARMED RESPONSE.â€ (Theyâ€™re usually just to the left of the â€œKerry/Edwardsâ€ signs.) Not only in Beverly Hills, of course, but in Santa Monica, Hancock Park, Brentwood, Bel Air, and all the best neighborhoods in town. The signs that advertise our private-security services.
You see, although we in Hollywood are personally opposed to firearms, and passionately support gun control, we have to be realistic about Bushâ€™s America and protect our families and, more important, our possessions from burglars, stalkers, muggers, street people, the homeless, immigrants, the Christian Right, and tourists from Kansas City.
Thatâ€™s why we were all so taken aback by the recent D.C. circuit-court ruling, which found that the residents of Washington are constitutionally entitled, as individuals, to possess firearms. Itâ€™s bad enough that every criminal in L.A. County has unlimited access to guns â€” now they want to give them to ordinary people, too?
Everyone knows perfectly well that the Bill of Rights was meant to protect the federal government against the depredations of the citizens â€” if you donâ€˜t believe me, just ask senators McCain and Feingold …
Read the whole thing.