Liberals like Paul Krugman deny that there is any such thing as Islamofascism.
There isnâ€™t actually any such thing as Islamofascism â€” itâ€™s not an ideology; itâ€™s a figment of the neocon imagination. The term came into vogue only because it was a way for Iraq hawks to gloss over the awkward transition from pursuing Osama bin Laden, who attacked America, to Saddam Hussein, who didnâ€™t.
Raymond Ibrahim, editor of the Al Qaeda Reader, a collection of texts and documents produced by the leaders of the Islamic extremist movement, compares the statements and positions of Al Qaeda to Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
How is The Al Qaeda Reader similar to Mein Kampf? A single sentence from the introduction of the 1999 edition of Mein Kampf, published by Mariner Books, goes a long way in answering this question: â€œHe [Hitler] had made his ultimate goals clear in Mein Kampf as early as 1926: rearmament, the abolition of democracy, territorial expansion, eugenics, the â€˜eliminationâ€™ of the â€˜Jewish threatâ€™â€ (Mein Kampf, xv).
The Al Qaeda Reader dwells on, if not obsesses over, four of these same five â€œultimate goalsâ€ of Hitlerâ€”everything but eugenics, which is a temporal byproduct of 19th century pseudo-scientific racial theories. But al-Qaedaâ€™s writings certainly dwell on dealing with the â€œJewish threat,â€ overthrowing the â€œpagan religionâ€ of democracy, both territorial re-conquests (from Palestine to Andalusia) and territorial expansion (to the whole world), as well as rearmament. Even more telling, the â€œfascisticâ€ tone of Mein Kampfâ€”ridicule and contempt for modernity and peace, praise for heroism and martyrdom, condemnation of promiscuity and lax moresâ€”saturates The Al Qaeda Reader. Indeed, that there are many similarities is best represented by the fact that the German words â€œmein kampfâ€ translate to â€œjihad-iâ€â€”or, â€œmy jihadâ€â€”in Arabic.
Read the whole thing.