Roger Clegg, at PJM, describes how ideology enables cynical efforts by democrats to expand their voting base.
The other day I read a couple of letters to the editor of the New York Times, from people who were sincerely offended that, as had been discussed in a recent Times article, mentally deranged people are often not allowed to vote.
Hereâ€™s part of one letter: â€œI am very troubled by [your article], which reports political efforts to prevent people with mental disorders and elderly people with dementia from voting. Our constitutional right to vote does not require that any one of us make a rational choice. â€¦â€
Hereâ€™s part of the other: â€œI was appalled to learn that the mentally ill can be kept from voting, and that some are trying to make it even harder for them to participate in the democratic processâ€¦.Our governmentâ€™s just powers must be derived from the consent of all the governed, not merely an elite comprised of mentally sound elders.â€
The former letter, by the way, is from a doctor; the latter letter also cites with approval the lowering of the voting age in Austria to 16. I should add that the American Bar Association voted favorably at its annual convention this summer on a resolution that will urge jurisdictions to make it easier for mentally incompetent people to vote. And there is a much-publicized, multifront effort to curtail the practice in many states of disenfranchising felons, and there are even activists who think that noncitizens should be allowed to vote.
It is a pretty basic question for our system of government, isnâ€™t it: Who should be allowed to vote?
There are only four groups of people who are generally not allowed to vote in the U.S. now, and the Left wants to enfranchise more of all of them: children, criminals, noncitizens, and the mentally ill.