Barack Obama aspires to be a transformative national leader like Ronald Reagan was, but Steve Kornacki thinks the O-man has a much greater resemblance to the little peanut farmer from Georgia.
Once again, the Democrats seem ready to nominate a candidate whose appeal is rooted more in the emotions that he stirs than in the details of his 12-point plans. For Jimmy Carter in 1976, the operative word was trust. For Barack Obama in 2008, it is hope.
Actually, the similarities between Carter and Obama are considerable. Like Obama, Carterâ€™s resume included service in a state Legislature (rare for a president), and only a very brief stint in high-profile office, his single term as Georgiaâ€™s governor from 1970 to 1974. Obama, of course, has only been in the U.S. Senate since 2005, after an eight-year run in the Illinois state Senate.
Both also outsmarted their intra-party foes when it came to primary strategy. In â€˜76, Carter was the lone Democrat to comprehend the opportunities that attended the proliferation of state primaries and caucuses, entering the race early and targeting every state, a tactic that produced weekly victories, hordes of delegates, and a gathering sense of momentum that left his late-starting rivals in the dust. Similarly, the wisdom of Obamaâ€™s decision to contest small caucus states and all of the mid-size contests between Super Tuesday and March 4â€”and the lack of wisdom in Hillary Clintonâ€™s decision not to do soâ€”is only now becoming clear.
Most significantly, both men came along at exactly the right time. Carterâ€™s peanut-farmer-from-Plains simplicity and his oft-repeated promise that he â€œwill never lie to youâ€ were powerful political weapons after Nixon and his wiretapping, his plumbers and his pardon from Ford. And Obamaâ€™s message of hopeâ€”and his own life storyâ€”resonates with an electorate that, after these past eight years, feels utterly disconnected from its government and simply wants to believe in someone again.
In the â€™76 primaries, Carterâ€™s Democratic foes at first ignored his trust theme and thenâ€”when it was too lateâ€”brayed against it, warning that heâ€™d been maddeningly vague about what heâ€™d actually do as president. Hillary Clintonâ€™s warnings about Obama, it appears, have been just as tardy and futile.
But the â€™76 example tells us that criticisms that donâ€™t stick during the primary season can still work in the general election. Day after day in fall campaign, the Ford forces pounded away at the experience question and painted Carter as a political illusion, an affable-seeming politician who was terrified of expressing his opinion on any controversial topic.
â€œIt is not enough to say, â€˜Trust me,â€™â€ Ford said at one rally. â€œTrust must be earned. Trust is not having to guess what a candidate means. Trust is leveling with people before the election about what youâ€™re going to do after the election. Trust is not being all things to all people, but being the same thing to all people.â€
The media eventually caught on too, scrutinizing Carter with a daily intensity that was absent in the primary season, and Carterâ€™s lead steadily eroded.
McCain is readying the same kind of attack against Obama.
â€œIâ€™m not the youngest candidate,â€ he said last week. â€œBut Iâ€™m the most experienced.â€ And at a different event, he charged that Obama is offering â€œan eloquent but empty call for change.â€
Obama may prove a more durable fall candidate that Carter. Heâ€™s been more specific in his proposals than Carter was (see: health care and diplomacy with hostile nations), and his personal bond with the electorate may prove deeper and more intense than Carterâ€™s ever was.
But if youâ€™re tempted to think Obama has too much working in his favor to lose in November, just remember what very nearly happened in 1976.
Even if Obama should succeed, which I personally think is somewhat unlikely, in defeating John McCain, I suspect that, like Carter, he’ll function as transformative candidate in reverse, as a democrat whose disastrous policies, domestically and internationally, teach Americans exactly why they don’t want to elect leftist democrats.