Baldilocks, unlike myself, is religious, and has produced an impressive rant from her own genuinely Christian perspective.
Guys like Jeremiah Wright care about self-centric totems of race, culture and vengeance more than they care about leading their flocks down the straight and narrow path. They need these totems to fill the void of self-doubt and that need is filled by navel-gazing religions like Black Liberation Theology and one of its parents, the Nation of Islam. Yes, BLT is a progeny of the NOI, Christianity and Marxismâ€”a bastard child, to be sure. Itâ€™s an I-deology all right and Wright has sacrificed the eternal souls of those who believe his lies and are grateful for his good works. He has sacrificed these upon the altar of race and culture. (My own pastor says that God has special plans for shepherdsâ€”pastorsâ€”who mislead their flocks.)
Wright’s megalomania is such that he couldnâ€™t even bring himself to hold his peace for Obamaâ€™s sakeâ€”thatâ€™s one of problems inherent in allying oneself with narcissistsâ€”and even had the nerve to be guarded by the Fruit of Islam, Daddyâ€™s the Nation of Islamâ€™s security force.
The most infuriating thing about Wright is his attempt to cover himself using other black people, black Christians, by saying that attacks on him werenâ€™t really about him but about the â€˜black church.’ And then he wants to fling around epithets like “Uncle Tom.”
Let’s be clear. Neither blackness, African, American or European origin, American nationality or American allegiance need a defense because such a defense would inherently be just as erroneously-focused as Jeremiah Wright’s jeremiad. Ethnic origins arenâ€™t things to be defended, denigrated or repudiated or sworn allegiance to–my own heritage stems from this continent and two other continents–these things simply are; these facts are existential. Nationality is special: itâ€™s existential but can also be voluntarily retained or released. And allegiance to any entity is entirely voluntary, but no one has to prove his/her allegiance to this country as part and parcel of a repudiation of an ethnicity or heritage. Those days went out with FDR.
Hereâ€™s what I do come to defend, to stand in defense of: Christianity and Christians who are black. Jeremiah Wright defames both and speaks for neither and little obscure me will not let him use either as fig leaf. Yes, our ancestors in this country and our kinsmen across the water fought to be just as Christian as other Christiansâ€”as Christian as our brothers who are white. And many of the latter stood for us and side-by-side with usâ€”not because of us primarily but because of the One Who is Primary. Has that particular battle been won? I say yes, though the war continues. But Wright not only continues to fight the battle, he willfully misunderstands the nature of the War and identity of the Enemy. And by doing that, he becomes the tool of the Enemy. Thatâ€™s his choice, but not mine and not that of those who focus on the Redemption offered by Christ instead of getting upon the Cross themselves.
To quote myself, there is no â€œblack church.â€ There is only the Church.
Word to Obama: thanks a lot, “brotha.” Nice pastor you have there.