Noah Pollak, at Commentary, notes that the blockade is on with respect to reviews of Douglas Feith’s book in the leading organs of the liberal establishment.
Imagine, for a moment, that you are the book review editor of a major newspaper, and a book has been written by someone who was a high-level public official deeply involved in what has been the biggest and most controversial story of the past half-decade.
This official has been mentioned in news stories in your paper on hundreds of occasions, your paperâ€™s editorials have regularly railed against him and his colleagues, and your paperâ€™s op-ed columnists have penned an entire oeuvre of scathing indictments of the policies he helped implement. The official, subjected to years of obloquy in your pages, writes an account of his involvement in the story that by any fair estimation is not just detailed and serious, but one of the most important and useful of its kind to date. Do you choose to review the book, or do you simply pretend that it was never written?
The book Iâ€™m talking about, of course, is War and Decision, former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feithâ€™s account of his role in the Iraq war. And it is being subjected to an astonishing and shameful blackout from many of Americaâ€™s biggest newspapers. Noting the decision of the Washington Post and New York Times not to review the book, Rich Lowry wrote, â€œApparently itâ€™s OK to heap every failure in Iraq on Feithâ€™s head, but then to turn around and pretend heâ€™s a figure of no consequence when he writes a book.â€
Curiosity got the better of me, so I checked to see whether the book has been reviewed by other large newspapers. The MSM does not disappoint: There has been no mention of War and Decision in USA Today, the LA Times, NY Daily News, Houston Chronicle, Boston Globe, Philadelphia Inquirer, Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, or Miami Herald. What charming behavior from our nationâ€™s journalism professionals. You would think the book interfered with the preferred narrative or something.