The London Times cannot resist the temptation of using the scary headline: Russia threatens military response to US missile defence deal.
And Matt Drudge links their story and adds an alarming photo of a missile launch.
(Oh no, Russia is already sending nukes our way!)
Was Russia really threatening to launch ballistic missiles or order some of its Combined-Arms Armies westward in the direction of the Fulda Gap?
No. Not really.
What the actual story said was:
Moscow argues that the missile shield would severely undermine the balance of European security and regards the proposed missile shield based in two former Communist countries as a hostile move.
â€œWe will be forced to react not with diplomatic, but with military-technical methods,â€ the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
Obviously, Russia was merely alluding darkly to its own capabilities of using technical methods to gain an ability to defeat defensive missiles. Russia is threatening a particular kind of arms race not a nuclear first strike or an invasion of Western Europe.
National Enquirer-style misleading headlines may win Drudge and the London Times a few more readers today, but they certainly do not increase readers’ respect for those particular sources. I’d say that they are only trading future readers for some extra ones today.
Please Leave a Comment!