14 Jan 2009

Al Qaeda to Receive Reinforcements

, , ,

photo: Brennan Linsley

Barack Obama is widely expected to fulfill his campaign promise to close the US detention center at Guantanamo, if not on Day One of his administration, as soon as can practically be arranged.

The prison at Guantanamo Bay has been made into a symbol of Bush Administration offenses by the left, and its closing will appropriately signal the left’s victory in the struggle with George W. Bush for public perception of reality. But, delightful as the consummating moment of wet liberal humanitarianism’s triumph ought to be, clever democrats like Obama can probably already predict the ultimate consequences.

Simply transferring jihadis to US federal prisons will amount to moving them to the US domestic justice system, with all of them armed and equipped with top flight representation right out of America’s best law schools and white shoe law firms. Renditioning Guantanamo inmates to remote foreign locations where leftwing reporters and attorneys from Shearman & Sterling are in shorter supply would be effective, but rendition has been made into a dirty word.

The Bush Administration, squirming and wriggling ineffectively under continual liberal attack, already released all the likely safe bets and questionable case prisoners.

Reuters reported yesterday on just how well that worked out.

The Pentagon said on Tuesday that 61 former detainees from its military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, appear to have returned to terrorism since their release from custody.

The Pentagon declined to give the names of the 61 released detainees, but at least one, Abdullah Saleh al-Ajmi, is pretty well known. He blew up seven Iraqi security force officers and himself in a suicide bombing last April 26th.

I’d say Barack Obama is in a no win situation.

3 Feedbacks on "Al Qaeda to Receive Reinforcements"

Lazarus Long

Maybe we can kill them properly this time.

Carrie M

So why should we bother with taking “prisoners of war” any more? These terrorists *want* to die …

Scott D

On the contrary, this is a major win for Obama. In the liberal mind there is nothing more honorable than to die while protecting your noble enemy.
In the liberal version of Dirty Harry, Harry refuses to shoot the misguided man he has pursued, who then cripples him for life, but is freed by a jury when he pleads that he has been forever changed by Harry’s actions. Cut to Harry twenty years later (on welfare and medicaid) choking out that he forgives the man.


Please Leave a Comment!

Please note: Comments may be moderated. It may take a while for them to show on the page.

Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)
Feed Shark