Andrew Neather, a former speechwriter for Tony Blair, Jack Straw, and other Labour panjandrums, revealed recently, in a column in the Evening Standard defending Labour immigration policies, that Labour ministers encouraged massive Third World immigration out of a desire to change the character of the British nation, as well as in order to insult the political right while enlarging its own constituency. Labour’s policy was deliberately concealed from its own supporters, because it was recognized that many core Labour voters would not approve.
Labour ministers deliberately encouraged mass immigration to diversify Britain over the past decade, a former Downing Street adviser has claimed.
Andrew Neather said the mass influx of migrant workers seen in recent years was not the result of a mistake or miscalculation but rather a policy the party preferred not to reveal to its core voters.
He said the strategy was intended to fill gaps in the labour market and make the UK more multicultural, at the same time as scoring political points against the Opposition.
Mr Neather worked as a speechwriter for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
“Mass migration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural,” he wrote in in the London Evening Standard.
“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if it wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”
———————————-
The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.
Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.
———————————-
It is difficult to read all this, which is obviously perfectly true, and grasp that changes in fashionable opinion mysteriously came to pass resulting in our living in a time in which it is only too probable that the people able to rise to the top leadership positions in Western societies are highly likely to have a deeply negative view of their own country’s history and institutions, and even of their own people. So negative a view that they would be committed not to the preservation of their own country’s values, institutions, and character, but to their elimination.
EVELYN
I have known about this since the late 1960s, ever since the Harold Wilson & James Callaghan regimes.
What has always puzzled me, is
a) Why did it take so long for the press to work this one out?
b) Why did the Conservatives never complain that there was the most outrageous Gerrymandering going on, which amounted to the worst national scandal we had ever seen?
c) Why did so many people in high places, and of powerful status, refuse to support Enoch Powell, and say openly that he was absolutely right?
d) Why, over the last 40 years, did so many people, in politically powerful positions, so tamely and meekly succumb to all the emotional blackmail and chicanery wrapped up in this wretched word – this wretched American import – i.e the word “Racism”.
The word means nothing, when ordinary, modest-income, working-class people find themselves being pushed out of their own cities by massive influxes of immigrants, whom they simply do not want. They look on in despair as whole neighbourhoods are taken over by incomers, as house-prices soar because of greatly increased pressure of demand. Then they become totally bewildered when the very people that they expected to protect from all this, simply snipe & sneer at them, and shout “Shut up and stop being Racist”.
The answer to all these puzzles is all about MONEY. All the politicians ever wanted was plenty of Arab OIL MONEY in the City of London, and plenty of rich “Asian” Businessmen paying lots of money into Labour Party funds.
The general British Public were subjected to the most massive, most scandalous con-trick there ever was, through the use of emotional blackmail and the word “Racism”.
James Callaghan (that “nice” guy) was the worst of the original offenders; and the whole Labour Party has followed his treacherous lead ever since. They were all so desperate for power-at-any-price, that they were more than ready to sell our children’s & grandchildren’s future, in a politically & socially stable, historically single-nation country – in return for temporary power & status for themselves.
Ironically, the very section of society whose interests they claimed to represent, (the working classes of no great power or status) were the very ones whom they let down very badly.
Please Leave a Comment!