Eric Holder and Barack Obama
A.J. Strata argues that it was not just random luck that nobody did anything to stop Major Hasan before the Fort Hood massacre and not just one of those things that Abdulmutallab was given a US visa and never promoted to the no-fly list, counter-terrorism effort has been slackened by the current administration and liberal pieties prioritized above saving American lives.
This new, liberal leaning administration took the high tempo of a heated war against a dangerous, evil enemy and turned into a cautious criminal investigation of â€˜extremistsâ€™ who cause â€˜man made disastersâ€™. This change had consequences â€“ intended and otherwise. War means â€˜whatever it takesâ€™, crime investigation is slow and cautious and shrouded in personal protections for the â€˜accusedâ€™.
They also legally threatened those who were tirelessly defending this nation 24Ã—7. Where people were once willing (and rewarded) to go the extra mile, make personal sacrifices, spend the extra time to ensure a lead was not the next 9-11, the new administration deflated that drive and made our defenders more concerned with their own security than national security. …
We have growing evidence Team Obama made changes in our national security posture which could easily have resulted in the Nigerian bomber getting through our defenses. First from a career State Department source:
This employee says that despite statements from the Obama Administration, such information was flagged and given higher priority during the Bush Administration, but that since the changeover â€œwe are encouraged to not create the appearance that we are profiling or targeting Muslims.
And then there were these massive organizational changes to a system that was protecting us:
Obama fundamentally altered the culture and risk-taking incentives of the intelligence community with policy and personnel changes. The sense of urgency is gone, and heâ€™s made it uncool to call the war on terror a war at all. If he wants to treat terrorism like a criminal act, rather than an act of war, we should not be surprised when the results look a lot like the bureaucratic foul-ups that happen all the time in law enforcement. He gutted the Homeland Security Council coordinating role, he diluted the focus of the daily intel brief, he made CIA officials worry more about being prosecuted for doing their jobs than capturing terrorists. â€¦ Heâ€™s made it his business to turn much of the national security apparatus set up by Bush and Cheney upside down and has succeeded â€¦
Richard Clarke was a thorn in the side of President Bush for years after 9-11. He was in the Clinton Administration on the National Security Council. He is also quite accurate in his assessment of what happened inside the Obama Administration that led to these incidents (Ft Hood Massacre and Flight 253):
“It points to something fundamental,â€ said Richard A. Clarke, a former top counter-terrorism official in the Bush and Clinton administrations. â€œNo matter how good your software is or how good your procedures are, at the end of the day it comes back to people. And if people think that this is a 9-5 job and theyâ€™re not filled with a sense of urgency every day, then youâ€™ll get these kinds of mistakes.â€
That is the distinction between fighting a war and the job of investigating crime. That is the difference between being rewarded for extra effort instead of scrutinized and threatened for it. Same tools, different attitude. Are we surprised in the different results?