The Birthers are not the issue. The issue is the U.S. Constitution. The first paragraph of the United States Supreme Court’s website makes the following promise to the American People – “As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.” To date, the United States Supreme Court has failed to do anything in furtherance of the search for the truth about Obama’s natural born citizen status. Furthermore, not one single solitary person or agency in the Executive, Legislative, or the rest of the Judicial branch of government has done anything other than accept Obama’s posted Certification of Live Birth as conclusive evidence of his alleged birthplace.

Mr. Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. As his only evidence that he meets the Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a President be a natural born citizen, he produced a scant summary document called a “Certification of Live Birth,” which he posted on his website under the title: “Barack Obama’s Official Birth Certificate.”

At first blush, it is case closed. A closer examination of the facts, however, reveals that Mr. Obama failed to point out on his website that his posted “Official Birth Certificate,” as he called it, is actually a 2007 computer-generated, laser-printed scant summary document of his 1961 vital record(s) on file with the Hawaii State Department of Health. What we do not know, however, is what 1961 vital record the Certification of Live Birth is summarizing.

In 1961 there were at least six different procedures available to obtain a vital record (birth certificate) that the Certification of Live Birth could be summarizing. Five of the six procedures lacked adequate indicia of reliability and trustworthiness because they were fraught with the potential for fraud. That said, an “official” state-issued document that summarizes a document that lacks adequate indicia of reliability and trustworthiness is not worth the paper it is printed on. Scans of the original Hawaii Revised Laws from that era can be found at http://birther.com.

I’ll close this post with a quote: “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

1. I knew he was a bastard. We still don’t know what kind of bastard.
2. Resolved: every candidate for office has a positive duty to prove he or she meets the statutory requirements to hold such office. Candidates for national office shall submit their proof to the F.B.I. for preliminary investigation.
3. Evidence? Forsetti, I think, disposes of the “evidence” to the contrary.
4. Regarding the pejorative use of “birther”, let us recall that Sen. Joseph McCarthy was, after all, under-counting Commies.

Obama gives new meaning to the phrase “son of a bitch.” In fact, he is an affront to sob’s everywhere.

He should resign.

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE THE DESIRE TO SEE THE TRUTH STILL ARE NOT PREPARED TO ACOMMPISH THE MISSION! FREEDOM DOES HAVE A PRICE THE PROTECTED ARE NOT WILLING TO PAY! TO COMMAND FREEDOM THE END RESULT MUST BE ACHEIVED! STOP GIVING UP THE BATTLE BEFORE WE GO TO WAR! WORRING WHAT OBAMA IS DOING TO COVERUP THE LIES AND USE THE SAME TACTICS! SACRIFICE YOURSELVES FOR THE CAUSE!

Not a new theory at all. However, there are other possible negroes besides Frank Davis. Stanley Ann Dunham liked dark meat; her son tells us that. She may have conceived Barack in a one-night stand. Parentage would not have bothered her much. She would have rationalized that most negroes don’t know or care who their father was. (An observation that seems still to be true, and might explain the dearth of African-American birthers.)