Mark Steyn argues that it can happen here, that the ideology of the left can alter the national character and turn a nation of self reliant individualists into whining clients of a socialist nanny state in terminal decline, and Barack Obama is here to prove it.
[W]hat are we to make of the British? They were on the right side of all the great conflicts of the last century; and they have been, in the scales of history, a force for good in the world. Even as their colonies advanced to independence, they retained the English language and English legal system, not to mention cricket and all kinds of other cultural ties. And even in imperial retreat, there is no rational basis for late-20th-century Britainâ€™s conclusion that it had no future other than as an outlying province of a centralized Euro nanny state dominated by nations whose political, legal, and cultural traditions are entirely alien to its own. The embrace of such a fate is a psychological condition, not an economic one.
Is America set for decline? Itâ€™s been a grand run. The countryâ€™s been the leading economic power since it overtook Britain in the 1880s. Thatâ€™s impressive. Nevertheless, over the course of that century and a quarter, Detroit went from the worldâ€™s industrial powerhouse to an urban wasteland, and the once-golden state of California atrophied into a land of government run by the government for the government. What happens when the policies that brought ruin to Detroit and sclerosis to California become the basis for the nation at large? Strictly on the numbers, the United States is in the express lane to Declinistan: unsustainable entitlements, the remorseless governmentalization of the economy and individual liberty, and a centralization of power that will cripple a nation of this size. Decline is the way to bet. But what will ensure it is if the American people accept decline as a price worth paying for European social democracy.
Is that so hard to imagine? Every time I retail the latest indignity imposed upon the â€œcitizenâ€ by some or other Continental apparatchik, I receive e-mails from the heartland pointing out, with much reference to the Second Amendment, that it couldnâ€™t happen here because Americans arenâ€™t Euro-weenies. But nor were Euro-weenies once upon a time. Hayekâ€™s greatest insight in The Road to Serfdom is psychological: â€œThere is one aspect of the change in moral values brought about by the advance of collectivism which at the present time provides special food for thought,â€ he wrote with an immigrantâ€™s eye on the Britain of 1944. â€œIt is that the virtues which are held less and less in esteem and which consequently become rarer are precisely those on which the British people justly prided themselves and in which they were generally agreed to excel. The virtues possessed by Anglo-Saxons in a higher degree than most other people, excepting only a few of the smaller nations, like the Swiss and the Dutch, were independence and self-reliance, individual initiative and local responsibility, the successful reliance on voluntary activity, noninterference with oneâ€™s neighbor and tolerance of the different and queer, respect for custom and tradition, and a healthy suspicion of power and authority.â€ Two-thirds of a century on, almost every item on the list has been abandoned, from â€œindependence and self-relianceâ€ (40 percent of people receive state handouts) to â€œa healthy suspicion of power and authorityâ€ â€” the reflex response now to almost any passing inconvenience is to demand the government â€œdo something,â€ the cost to individual liberty be damned. American exceptionalism would have to be awfully exceptional to suffer a similar expansion of government and not witness, in enough of the populace, the same descent into dependency and fatalism. As Europe demonstrates, a determined state can change the character of a people in the space of a generation or two. Look at what the Great Society did to the black family and imagine it applied to the general population: Thatâ€™s what happened in Britain. …
In the modern era, the two halves of â€œthe Westâ€ form a mirror image. â€œThe Old Worldâ€ has thousand-year-old churches and medieval street plans and ancient hedgerows but has been distressingly susceptible to every insane political fad, from Communism to Fascism to European Union. â€œThe New Worldâ€ has a superficial novelty â€” you can have your macchiato tweeted directly to your iPod â€” but underneath the surface noise it has remained truer to old political ideas than â€œthe Old Worldâ€ ever has. Economic dynamism and political continuity seem far more central to Americaâ€™s sense of itself than they are to most nationsâ€™. Which is why itâ€™s easier to contemplate Spain or Germany as a backwater than America. In a fundamental sense, an America in eclipse would no longer be America.
But, as Charles Krauthammer said recently, â€œdecline is a choice.â€ The Democrats are offering it to the American people, and a certain proportion of them seem minded to accept. Enough to make decline inevitable? To return to the young schoolboy on his uncleâ€™s shoulders watching the Queen-Empressâ€™s jubilee, in the words of Arnold Toynbee: â€œCivilizations die from suicide, not from murder.â€
Hat tip to Karen L. Myers.