Liberal William Galston, in New Republic, sums up the democrats’ electoral problem.
They have, according to Galston, “an impressive record of accomplishment,” but the American people do not like what they’ve accomplished.
Thereâ€™s an old joke in advertising circles that goes like this: A big firm gets an account to launch a new brand of dog food. Itâ€™s an all-hands-on-deck operation, with people working flat-out on logos, slogans, music, endorsements, product placement, and ads suited to every medium. Launch day comes, and everything goes perfectly. But after a couple of weeks, sales are miserable, and it becomes clear that the campaign is tanking.
The entire firm gathers in the big conference room for a gloomy post-mortem. Each element of the launch is second-guessed, and recriminations are flying. Finally, a junior writer in a seat against the wall timidly raises his hand and ventures his opinion: â€œMaybe the dogs didnâ€™t like it.â€ …
In a survey out last week, Gallup finds that of five major pieces of legislation, only financial regulatory reform enjoys majority support. …
The bottom line: the majority can neither run on its record nor run away from it. Its only hope is to convince the American people that giving power to an opposition party in its angriest and least moderate mood would only make things worse.
Nach dem Aufstand des 17. Juni
LieÃŸ der SekretÃ¤r des Schriftstellerverbands
In der Stalinallee FlugblÃ¤tter verteilen
Auf denen zu lesen war, daÃŸ das Volk
Das Vertrauen der Regierung verscherzt habe
Und es nur durch verdoppelte Arbeit
ZurÃ¼ckerobern kÃ¶nne. WÃ¤re es da
Nicht doch einfacher, die Regierung
LÃ¶ste das Volk auf und
WÃ¤hlte ein anderes?
After the uprising of the 17th June
The Secretary of the Writer’s Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had forfeited the confidence of the government
And could win it back only
By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?