And he makes a good argument:
Miss Dunham, reflecting celebrity culture at large, makes a fetish of voting, and it is easy to see why: Voting is the most shallow gesture of citizenship there is, the issuance of a demand â€” a statement that â€œthis is how the world should be,â€ as Miss Dunham puts it â€” imposing nothing in the way of reciprocal responsibility. Power without responsibility â€” Stanley Baldwin would not have been surprised that Miss Dunham and likeminded celebrities think of voting in terms of their sex lives. Miss Dunham, in an earlier endorsement of Barack Obama, compared voting in the presidential election to losing oneâ€™s virginity â€” you want it to be someone special. Understood that way, voting is nothing other than a reiteration of the original infantile demand: â€œI Want!â€
As a procedure for sorting out complex policy issues, voting is of distinctly limited value: If you wanted to know whether the compressive strength of a particular material were sufficient to support a bridge over Interstate 20, you would not go about solving that problem by bundling that question with 10,000 other equally precise and complex but largely unrelated questions, presenting the bundle of questions to the least-informed few million people you could identify, and then proceeding with whatever solution 50 percent +1 of them preferred. That would be a bad way to build a bridge â€” a homicidal way, in fact â€” and though it is a necessary instrument of accountability in a democratic republic, voting properly plays a very limited role. For instance, we have a Bill of Rights, which could with equal accuracy be called the List of Stuff You Idiots Canâ€™t Be Trusted To Vote On. A majority of Americans donâ€™t like free speech? Too bad, Harry Reid.
But for Miss Dunham et al., this isnâ€™t a question of citizenship â€” itâ€™s a therapeutic matter. Voting, she promises, will offer â€œa sense of accomplishment,â€ knowledge that one has done the right thing, even â€œjoy.â€ But checking a box is the most trivial accomplishment imaginable; having done so is no guarantee that one has done the right thing, inasmuch as voters routinely make bad decisions for evil reasons; and one suspects that Miss Dunham means something different and less by â€œjoyâ€ than did, say, Beethoven or Walt Whitman. â€œI wore fishnets and a little black dress to vote,â€ she writes, â€œthen walked around with a spring in my slinky step. It lasted for days. I can summon it when Iâ€™m blue. Itâ€™s more effective than exercise or ecstasy or cheesecake.â€ And that of course is the highest purpose of our ancient constitutional order: to provide adult children with pleasures exceeding those of cheesecake or empathogenic phenethylamines.
Hat tip to Darleen Click via Karen L. Myers.