Antonio GarcÃa MartÃnez analyses the California dystopia where everyone talks and votes left, but lives in an unequal (and rather squalid) society that makes Norman England look like the land of Equality.
California is the future of the United States, goes the oft-cited clichÃ©. What the US is doing now, Europe will be doing in five years, goes another. Given those truthy maxims, letâ€™s examine the socioeconomics of the â€œCity by the Bayâ€ as a harbinger of whatâ€™s to come.
Data shows that technology and services make up a large fraction of citywide employment. It also shows that unemployment and housing prices follow the tech industryâ€™s boom-and-bust cycle. Amid the current boom, a family of four earning $117,400 now qualifies as low-income in San Francisco. Some readers laughed when I wrote in a memoir about working at Facebook that my six-figure compensation made me â€œbarely middle class.â€ As it turns out, I wasnâ€™t far off. With that credential, consider this rumination on bougie life inside the San Francisco bubble, which seems consistent with the data and the experience of other local techies.
San Francisco residents seem to be divided into four broad classes, or perhaps even castes:
The Inner Party of venture capitalists and successful entrepreneurs who run the tech machine that is the engine of the cityâ€™s economy.
The Outer Party of skilled technicians, operations people, and marketers that keep the trains belonging to the Inner Party running on time. They are paid well, but they’re still essentially living middle-class livesâ€”or what lives the middle class used to have.
The Service Class in the â€œgig economy.â€ In the past, computers filled hard-for-humans gaps in a human value chain. Now humans fill hard-for-software gaps in a software value chain. These are the jobs that AI hasn’t managed to eliminate yet, where humans are expendable cogs in an automated machine: Uber drivers, Instacart shoppers, TaskRabbit manual labor, etc.
Lastly, thereâ€™s the Untouchable class of the homeless, drug addicted, and/or criminal. These people live at the ever-growing margins: the tent cities and areas of hopeless urban blight. The Inner Party doesnâ€™t even see them, the Outer Party ignores them, and the Service Class eyes them warily; after all, they could end up there.
Mobility among the castes seems minimal. An Outer Party member could reach the Inner Party by chancing into an early job at a lottery-ticket company (such as Facebook or Google) or by becoming a successful entrepreneur. But thatâ€™s rare; most of the Outer Party prefers working for the Inner Party, gradually accumulating equity through stock grants and appreciating real estate.
The Service Class will likely never be able to drive/shop/handyman enough to rise to the Outer Party, at least not without additional training or skills. They’re mostly avoiding the descent to Untouchable status, while dealing with precarious gigs that disappear semi-regularly. Uber, for example, has made no bones about its intent to replace its drivers with robots. Delivery bots have already been deployed on city streets, though they were later restricted.
I’ve forgotten where I snagged this from
“Thereâ€™s this meme that tech culture is solving one problem: â€œWhat is my mother no longer doing for me?â€ Or, as George Packer put it in 2013, â€œIt suddenly occurred to me that the hottest tech start-ups are solving all the problems of being twenty years old, with cash on hand, because thatâ€™s who thinks them up.â€”
One wonders if that will continue or as the Outer Party ages, they might solve more relatable problems of their 30s. Past practice seems to have been to bring in new 20 year olds.
Please Leave a Comment!