16 Apr 2021

Why Chauvin Must Be Ruled Innocent

, ,

Our Law is based on the English Common Law, and the pertinent case is The King v. Hodgson, “a knave who feloniously and maliciously starts a ‘chain reaction’ of acts dangerous to human life must be held responsible for the natural fatal results of such acts.” — 1 Leach 7, 168 Eng. Rep. 105 (1730), which principle was upheld in Commonwealth v. Almeida. –362 Pa. 596, 68 A.2d 595 (1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 924 (1950).

StumbleUpon.com
4 Feedbacks on "Why Chauvin Must Be Ruled Innocent"

Seattle Sam

I think this was replaced by Woke Law: Laws that don’t not bring about the desired result are invalid.



Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove

[…] Never Yet Melted discusses why Derek Chauvin must be declared not-guilty […]



John T Sanford

I would venture that the jury should find “not guilty” on all charges because the prosecution has failed to present three dead bodies. That or triple jeopardy, your pick.



Mike-SMO

“Woke” Law is adaptable to the needs of the moment, and to a performance by Mad Maxie. That there “White” law don’t hold no truck no more. That leaves more time for the improv narrative.



Comments

Please Leave a Comment!




Please note: Comments may be moderated. It may take a while for them to show on the page.





/div>








Feeds
Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)
Feed Shark