Newt Gingrich made the following prediction on Meet the Press last Sunday:
[Y]ouâ€™ve got $513 billion in tax increases, $470 billion in Medicare cuts. You have a scale of, I think, bribery in the Senate we have not seen in our lifetime, with various senators getting all sorts of special deals in a way that I think the public is just appalled by. I suspect every Republican running in â€˜10 and again in â€˜12 will run on an absolute pledge to repeal this bill.
The bill — most of the bill does not go into effect until â€˜13 or â€˜14, except on the tax increase side; and therefore, I think there wonâ€™t be any great constituency for it. And I think itâ€™ll be a major campaign theme. This is a bad bill, written in a horrible way, and the most — the most corrupt legislation Iâ€™ve seen in my lifetime.
Gingrich’s repeal pledge went largely unnoticed on the right, but it certainly got the left’s attention.
Leftie bloggers are busily spinning today about how impossible it would be to repeal the health care bill (Steve Benen), and Matt Yglesias has even devised an epithet to apply to people like me: we’re Repealers.
I think those leftwing bloggers are whistling past the political graveyard.
Look at Rasmussen’s latest poll on Ben Nelson’s standing after the health care vote.
The good news for Senator Ben Nelson is that he doesnâ€™t have to face Nebraska voters until 2012.
If Governor Dave Heineman challenges Nelson for the Senate job, a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey shows the Republican would get 61% of the vote while Nelson would get just 30%. Nelson was reelected to a second Senate term in 2006 with 64% of the vote.
Nelson’s health care vote is clearly dragging his numbers down. Just 17% of Nebraska voters approve of the deal their senator made on Medicaid in exchange for his vote in support of the plan. Overall, 64% oppose the health care legislation, including 53% who are Strongly Opposed.