Lead Codices Are Fakes
Codices, Fakes, Fraud, Lead Codices
“Earliest image of Christ,” according to the newspapers.
Yesterday’s Daily Mail big story was a new antiquities discovery supposedly liable to eclipse the Dead Sea Scrolls in importance as a new source of information on early Christianity and First Century Judaism.
It turns out that these are fakes which have already been thoroughly debunked on a number of specialist blogs.
Daniel O. McLellan quoted Peter Thoneman’s analysis of one of the ancient texts:
The Greek text at the top of your photo no. 0556 reads: ΛΛΥΠΕΧΛΙΡΕΛΒΓΛΡΟΚΛΙΕΙΣΙΩÎ, followed by ΛΛΥΠΕ in mirror-writing.
This text corresponds to ΛΛΥΠΕ ΧΛΙΡΕ ΛΒΓΛΡ Ο ΚΛΙ ΕΙΣΙΩÎ, i.e. ἄλυπε χαῖÏε, á¼ˆÎ²Î³Î±Ï á½ ÎºÎ±á½¶ Εἰσίων, followed by the word ἄλυπε again, in mirror writing. The text at the bottom of your photo no. 0532 is the first part of the same text again: ΛΥΠΕΧΛΙΡΕΛΒΓ, i.e. [ἄ]λυπε χαῖÏε, Ἀβγ…
The text was incised by someone who did not know the Greek language, since he does not distinguish between the letters lambda and alpha: both are simply represented, in each of the texts, by the shape Λ.
The text literally means ‘without grief, farewell! Abgar also known as Eision’. This text, in isolation, is meaningless.
However, this text corresponds precisely to line 2 of the Greek text of a bilingual Aramaic/Greek inscription published by J.T. Milik, Syria 35 (1958) 243-6 no.6 (SEG 20, 494), and republished in P.-L. Gatier, Inscriptions grecques et latines de Syrie XXI: Inscriptions de la Jordanie, 2: Region centrale (Paris 1986), no.118. That inscription reads, in its entirety, as follows,
1 Σελαμαν χÏηστὲ καὶ
2 ἄλυπε χαῖÏε, á¼ˆÎ²Î³Î±Ï á½ ÎºÎ±á½¶ Εἰσίων
3 Μονοαθου υἱὸς υἱῷ τειμίῳ τὸ μνῆμα
4 á¼Ï€Î¿Î¯Î·ÏƒÎµÎ½ ἔτους Ï„Ïίτου á¼Ï€Î±Ïχείας’For Selaman, excellent and harmless man, farewell! Abgar, also known as Eision, son of Monoathos, constructed this tomb for his excellent son (i.e. Selaman), in the third year of the province’.
This is a stone tombstone from Madaba in Jordan, precisely dated to AD 108/9, on display in the Archaeological Museum in Amman.
The text on your bronze tablet, therefore, makes no sense in its own right, but has been extracted unintelligently from another longer text. … The longer text from which it derives is a perfectly ordinary tombstone from Madaba in Jordan which happens to have been on display in the Amman museum for the past fifty years or so. The text on your bronze tablet is repeated, in part, in three different places, meaningless in each case.
The only possible explanation is that the text on the bronze tablet was copied directly from the inscription in the museum at Amman by someone who did not understand the meaning of the text of the inscription, but was simply looking for a plausible-looking sequence of Greek letters to copy. He copied that sequence three times, in each case mixing up the letters alpha and lambda.
This particular bronze tablet is, therefore, a modern forgery, produced in Jordan within the last fifty years. I would stake my career on it.
Mark Goodacre posted links to several more articles by legitimate scholars.
In general, the New Testament/codicology sector of the blogosphere was expressing satisfaction at how quickly and thoroughly this one had been debunked.