05 Jan 2006

Italian Court to Decide on the Historical Existence of Jesus of Nazareth

, , ,

A comedic spectacle worthy of the old-time confrontations between the Communist mayor Peppone and Catholic priest Don Camillo in the novels of Guiseppi Guareschi will soon be playing out in an Italian courtroom:

An Italian court is tackling Jesus — and whether the Roman Catholic Church may be breaking the law by teaching that he existed 2,000 years ago.

The case pits against each other two men in their 70s, who are from the same central Italian town and even went to the same seminary school in their teenage years.

The defendant, Enrico Righi, went on to become a priest writing for the parish newspaper. The plaintiff, Luigi Cascioli, became a vocal atheist who, after years of legal wrangling, is set to get his day in court later this month.

“I started this lawsuit because I wanted to deal the final blow against the Church, the bearer of obscurantism and regression,” Cascioli told Reuters.

Cascioli says Righi, and by extension the whole Church, broke two Italian laws. The first is “Abuso di Credulita Popolare” (Abuse of Popular Belief) meant to protect people against being swindled or conned. The second crime, he says, is “Sostituzione di Persona,” or impersonation.

“The Church constructed Christ upon the personality of John of Gamala,” Cascioli claimed, referring to the 1st century Jew who fought against the Roman army.

“In my book, ‘The Fable of Christ,’ I present proof Jesus did not exist as a historic figure. He must now refute this by showing proof of Christ’s existence,” Cascioli said.


Signore Cascioli is evidently unacquainted with Flavius Josephus’ Antiquities of the Jews (William Whiston, translation) 63:

Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.

3 Feedbacks on "Italian Court to Decide on the Historical Existence of Jesus of Nazareth"

JR @ RightFaith

I think the existence of Jesus is pretty secure–that is, unless Italy has activist judges too.

Here’s my analysis of the whole thing: Could Jesus Suffer His Father’s Fate?


Well it is more amusing, critisizing this man and bringing proof without even having read anything on his site or read his book.
Try going to his site and tackle his questions ? http://www.luigicascioli.it


From an American viewpoint, the humor lies in the idea of bringing a lawsuit in the first place.

I did not really criticize Mr. Cascioli at all, but he is clearly mistaken about the existence of Jesus of Nazareth as a historical person. The rise of Christianity and the written gospels provide considerable evidence in themselves of the existence of a historical Jesus, and his existence is also attested to by the nearly contemporaneous non-Christian historian Josephus.


Please Leave a Comment!

Please note: Comments may be moderated. It may take a while for them to show on the page.


Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)
Feed Shark