Campaign contributions by faculty and administrators at American colleges and universities routinely show a preference for democrat candidates in the high 90 percentages. Leftwing crazies and convicted terrorists have no problem being hired as faculty members, but a speech by a visiting member of the Bush Administration is typically a cause cÃ©lÃ¨bre resulting in angry petitions and demonstrations.
“Who cares?” says Inside Higher Education, we have a study demonstrating that American higher education is a complete waste of time and has virtually no intellectual impact whatsoever.
We also know that when someone gets to frame the questions, choose the methodology, and select the data, he can “prove” anything he wants to prove.
One of the key arguments made by David Horowitz and his supporters in recent years is that a left-wing orientation among faculty members results in a lack of curricular balance, which in turn leads to students being indoctrinated rather than educated. The argument is probably made most directly in a film much plugged by Horowitz: â€œIndoctrinate U.â€
A study that will appear soon in the journal PS: Political Science & Politics accepts the first part of the critique of academe and says that itâ€™s true that the professoriate leans left. But the study â€” notably by one Republican professor and one Democratic professor â€” finds no evidence of indoctrination. Despite students being educated by liberal professors, their politics change only marginally in their undergraduate years, and that deflates the idea that cadres of tenured radicals are somehow corrupting Americaâ€™s youth â€” or scaring them into adopting new political views.