Rick Moran comments on the latest liberal-manufactured controversy, defending Rush Limbaugh and song parodist Paul Shanklin.
Shanklinâ€™s stuff is mostly brilliant satire. But like all good political humor, it walks a line of good taste and decorum. In fact, by pushing the boundaries as Shanklin does, he defines for us the essence of political satire. In this respect (not in talent) Shanklinâ€™s material is no more objectionable than Jonathan Swift or George Orwell for that matter.
That is, unless youâ€™re a liberal seeking to make political hay and stifle free expression. You can criticize â€œBarack the Magic Negroâ€ as unfunny or not in good taste. But when you use the inflammatory word â€œracismâ€ to describe it, you go beyond critiquing the work and enter the world of pure politics. This liberals do on a regular basis and they get away with the sliming of political speech and speakers they disagree with because the press refuses to call them out on it.
In fact, the left has lowered the bar on what constitutes â€œracismâ€ by redefining the term to suit their own political needs. And by refusing to acknowledge any set definition of the word, the left deliberately undermines free speech by cutting off debate with liberals firmly ensconced in a superior moral position while the person being unfairly smeared as a racist is unable to defend themselves. If one tries to stand up and fight the charge, they give automatic legitimacy to the leftâ€™s argument. And if they remain silent in the face of such slimeball tactics, the smear works and sticks to the accused like glue.
Having said all this, is it an appropriate Christmas message from a potential RNC chairman? It wouldnâ€™t be my first choice but then I donâ€™t think Saltsman the guy for the job anyway.
What is clear is that this despicable tactic by the left predates Obama and has done more to poison relations between the races in this country than all the cross burnings and hate speech delivererd by the morons in the Klan or the Skinheads. The reason is simple; the left has appropriated the word â€œracistâ€ in order to define the debate on race â€“ any issue, any time, anywhere â€“ on their terms and their terms alone. Do you oppose Affirmative Action? Youâ€™re a racist. Do you oppose set asides for business based on race? You are a racist. Do you oppose racial quotas in college entrance requirements? You are a racist.
No debate. No exchange of ideas. No give and take on any issue that touches race unless you first accept the leftâ€™s position on these and other issues. If you donâ€™t, the debate is closed off by simply calling you a racist â€“ end of discussion.
So itâ€™s no surprise they see legitimate satire as â€œracist.â€ In fact, the surprise would be if they didnâ€™t.
Eric Alter has the song on video, and is shocked…. shocked! way back in April of ’07.
And here’s the David Ehrenstein La Times column from March 19, 2007, which first identified Barack Obama as representing the “Magical Negro” archetype.
Hat tip to the News Junkie.