Mike S. Adams thinks it’s desirable to spread the grade points around.
Previously, I announced that I would use a ten-point grading scale, which means that 90% of 100 is an â€œA,â€ 80% is a â€œB,â€ 70% is a â€œC,â€ and 60% is enough for a passing grade of â€œD.â€ I also announced that I will refrain from using a â€œplus/minusâ€ system â€“ even though the faculty handbook gives me that option.
The new policy I am announcing today is that those who score above 90 on the first exam will have points deducted and given to students at the bottom of the grade distribution. For example, if a student gets a 99, I will then deduct nine points and give them to the person with the lowest grade. If a person scores 95 I will then deduct five points and give them to the person with the second lowest grade. If someone scores 93 I will then deduct three points and give them to the next lowest person. And so on.
My point, rather obviously, is that any points above 90 are really not needed since you have an â€œAâ€ regardless of whether you score 90 or 99. Nor am I convinced that you need to â€œsaveâ€ those points for a rainy day. Those who are failing, however, need the points â€“ not unlike the failing banks and automakers that need money to avoid the danger of bankruptcy. …
But I donâ€™t think thereâ€™s anything confusing about our pending social responsibilities. Whether we are talking about income or grades it does not matter how much or what percentage we are giving. The question is and should always be â€œCan we give more?