Mark Steyn looks on in admiration as Barack Obama legislates via press conference pronouncement, then proceeds to analyse the great man’s “So-let-it-be-written-so-let-it-be-done” style of presidential leadership.
On Thursday, [Barack Obama] passed a new law at a press conference. George III never did that. But, having ordered Americaâ€™s insurance companies to comply with Obamacare, the president announced that he is now ordering them not to comply with Obamacare. The legislative branch (as itâ€™s still quaintly known) passed a law purporting to grandfather your existing health plan. The regulatory bureaucracy then interpreted the law so as to un-grandfather your health plan. So His Most Excellent Majesty has commanded that your health plan be de-un-grandfathered. That seems likely to work. The insurance industry had three years to prepare for the introduction of Obamacare. Now the King has given them six weeks to de-introduce Obamacare.
â€œI wonder if he has the legal authority to do this,â€ mused former Vermont governor Howard Dean. But heâ€™s obviously some kind of right-wing wacko. Later that day, anxious to help him out, Congress offered to â€œpassâ€ a â€œlawâ€ allowing people to keep their health plans. The same president who had unilaterally commanded that people be allowed to keep their health plans indignantly threatened to veto any such law to that effect: It only counts if he does it â€” geddit? As his court eunuchs at the Associated Press obligingly put it: â€œObama Will Allow Old Plans.â€ Itâ€™s Barryâ€™s world; we just live in it.
The reason for the benign Sovereignâ€™s exercise of the Royal Prerogative is that millions of his subjects â€” or â€œfolks,â€ as he prefers to call us, no fewer than 27 times during his press conference â€” have had their lives upended by Obamacare. Your traditional hard-core statist, surveying the mountain of human wreckage he has wrought, usually says, â€œWell, you canâ€™t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.â€ But Obama is the first to order that his omelet be unscrambled and the eggs put back in their original shells. Is this even doable? No. Thatâ€™s the point. When it doesnâ€™t work, heâ€™ll be able to give another press conference blaming the insurance companies, or the state commissioners, or George W. Bush . . .
The most telling line, the one that encapsulates the gulf between the boundless fantasies of the faculty-lounge utopian and the messiness of reality, was this: â€œWhat weâ€™re also discovering is that insurance is complicated to buy.â€ Gee, thanks for sharing, genius. Maybe you should have thought of that before you governmentalized one-sixth of the economy. …
[A]s historian Michael Beschloss pronounced the day after his election, heâ€™s â€œprobably the smartest guy ever to become president.â€ Naturally, Obama shares this assessment. As he assured us five years ago, â€œI know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors.â€ Well, apart from his signature health-care policy. Thatâ€™s a mystery to him. â€œI was not informed directly that the website would not be working,â€ he told us. The buck stops with something called â€œthe executive branch,â€ which is apparently nothing to do with him. As evidence that he was entirely out of the loop, he offered this:
Had I been I informed, I wouldnâ€™t be going out saying, â€œBoy, this is going to be great.â€ You know, Iâ€™m accused of a lot of things, but I donâ€™t think Iâ€™m stupid enough to go around saying, â€œThis is going to be like shopping on Amazon or Travelocity,â€ a week before the website opens, if I thought that it wasnâ€™t going to work.
Ooooo-kay. So, if I follow correctly, the smartest president ever is not smart enough to ensure that his website works; heâ€™s not smart enough to inquire of others as to whether his website works; heâ€™s not smart enough to check that his website works before he goes out and tells people what a great website experience theyâ€™re in for. But he is smart enough to know that heâ€™s not stupid enough to go around bragging about how well it works if heâ€™d already been informed that it doesnâ€™t work. So heâ€™s smart enough to know that if heâ€™d known what he didnâ€™t know heâ€™d know enough not to let it be known that he knew nothing. The countryâ€™s in the very best of hands.
Michael Beschloss is right: This is what it means to be smart in a neo-monarchical America. Obama spake, and it shall be so. And, if it turns out not to be so, why pick on him? He talks a good Royal Proclamation; why get hung up on details?
Until October 1, Obama had never done anything â€” not run a gas station, or a doughnut stand â€” other than let himself be wafted onward and upward to the next do-nothing gig. Even in his first term, he didnâ€™t really do: Starting with the 2009 trillion-dollar stimulus, he ran a money-no-object government that was all money and no objects; he spent and spent, and left no trace. Some things he massively expanded (food stamps, Social Security disability) and other things he massively diminished (effective foreign policy), but all were, so to speak, preexisting conditions. Obamacare is the first thing Obama has actually done, and, if youâ€™re the person itâ€™s being done to, itâ€™s not pretty.
The president promised to â€œfundamentally transformâ€ America. Certainly, other men have succeeded in transforming settled, free societies: Pierre Trudeau did in Canada four decades ago, and so, in post-war Britain, did the less charismatic Clement Attlee. And, if you subscribe to their particular philosophy, their transformations were effected very efficiently. But Obama is an incompetent, so â€œfundamentally transformedâ€ is a euphemism for â€œwrecked beyond repair.â€ As a socialist, he makes a good socialite.
But on he staggers, with a wave of his scepter, delaying this, staying that, exempting the other, according to his regal whim and internal polling. The omniscient beneficent Sovereign will now graciously â€œallowâ€ us â€œfolksâ€ to keep all those junk plans from bad-apple insurers. Yet even the wisest King cannot reign forever, and what will happen decades down the road were someone less benign â€” perhaps even (shudder) a Republican â€” to ascend the throne and wield these mighty powers?
Hey, relax: If you like your constitution, you can keep your constitution. Period. And your existing amendments. Well, most of them â€” except for the junk ones . . .