The ObamaCare debate is not about who gets a free ride and who pays the bills. We know who gets the free ride. We know who’s “privileged” to pay the bills. The debate is about arranging healthcare so those who pay don’t get in line ahead of those who don’t pay. We were promised repeal but, put simply, ObamaCare II remains just another way to force working people to subsidize non-working-and-never-will-work people. It’s also to the benefit of the insurance companies who wrote it, natch.
“The people comparing the Republican health plan to what Obamacare said it was going to do are like if passengers on Titanic lifeboats complained that the menu on the Carpathia the next day wasn’t going to be as good as what they had been promised on the Titanic.” â€“ David Forsmark on FB.
American Medical Association, Avik Roy, Individual Rights, Kevin Williamson, National Health Care, Obamacare
In 1949, Sir Samuel Fildesâ€™ painting â€œThe Doctorâ€ (1891) was used by the American Medical Association in a campaign against a proposal for nationalized medical care put forth by President Harry S. Truman. The image was used in posters and brochures along with the slogan, â€œKeep Politics Out of this Picture.â€ 65,000 posters of The Doctor were distributed, which helped to raise public skepticism of the nationalized health care campaign. By 2008,
unfortunately, the AMA was controlled by the Left and fighting for doctors’ and patients’ rights to private health care was no longer part of its agenda.
Kevin Williamson debunks the “Health Care is a right!” rhetoric.
With the American Health Care Act dominating the weekâ€™s news, one conversation has been unavoidable: Someone â€” someone who pays attention to public policy â€” will suggest that we pursue policy x, y, or z, and someone else â€” someone who pays a little less careful attention, who probably watches a lot of cable-television entertainment masquerading as news â€” responds: â€œThe first thing we have to do is acknowledge that health care is a human right!â€ What follows is a moment during which the second speaker visibly luxuriates in his display of empathy and virtue, which is, of course, the point of the exercise. …
Here is a thought experiment: You have four children and three apples. You would like for everyone to have his own apple. You go to Congress, and you successfully persuade the House and the Senate to endorse a joint resolution declaring that everyone has a right to an apple of his own. A ticker-tape parade is held in your honor, and you share your story with Oprah, after which you are invited to address the United Nations, which passes the International Convention on the Rights of These Four Kids in Particular to an Individual Apple Each. You are visited by the souls of Mohandas Gandhi and Mother Teresa, who beam down approvingly from a joint Hindu-Catholic cloud in Heaven. Question: How many apples do you have? You have three apples, dummy. Three. You have four children. Each of those children has a congressionally endorsed, U.N.-approved, saint-ratified right to an apple of his own. But hereâ€™s the thing: You have three apples and four children. Nothing has changed. Declaring a right in a scarce good is meaningless. It is a rhetorical gesture without any application to the events and conundrums of the real world. If the Dalai Lama were to lead 10,000 bodhisattvas in meditation, and the subject of that meditation was the human right to health care, it would do less good for the cause of actually providing people with health care than the lowliest temp at Merck does before his second cup of coffee on any given Tuesday morning. Health care is physical, not metaphysical. It consists of goods, such as penicillin and heart stents, and services, such as oncological attention and radiological expertise. Even if we entirely eliminated money from the equation, conscripting doctors into service and nationalizing the pharmaceutical factories, the basic economic question would remain. We tend to retreat into cheap moralizing when the economic realities become uncomfortable for us. No matter the health-care model you choose â€” British-style public monopoly, Swiss-style subsidized insurance, pure market capitalism â€” you end up with rationing: Markets ration through prices, bureaucracies ration through politics.
Claiming that you have a “Right to Health Care” usually amounts to the assertion that you have a right to force somebody else to pay for goods and services for your benefit, in essence a claim that you have a right to enslave other people.
Avik Roy puts it a different way. Avik argues that our right to health care consists of our right to obtain health services through voluntary interactions with health care providers, and Government is taking away that right.
For those enrolled in government-run health insurance, it is illegal to try to gain better access to doctors and dentists by offering to make up the difference between what health care costs, and what the government pays.
That basic rightâ€”the right of a woman and her doctor to freely exchange money for a needed medical serviceâ€”is one that 90 million Americans have been denied by their government. …
You see, health care is a right, in the same way that liberty is a right. And that libertyâ€”to freely seek the care we need, to pay for it in a way that is mutually convenient for us and our doctors, is one that our government is gradually taking out of our hands.
Kurt Schlichter has a message for President Obama and the Congressional GOP leadership.
When Paul Ryan and his congressional clown car of alleged conservatives surprised us by just sort of dropping Obamacare Jr. on us, I wasnâ€™t surprised to see them trip all over their Guccis during the utterly inept roll out. These nimrods couldnâ€™t effectively communicate to Elizabeth Warren with smoke signals. But even I was shocked at how transcendently crappy their proposed Obamacare replacement is. Let me put it this way: the only thing that steaming pile of failure would be good for is as the key prop in a very specialized, niche German porno film.
Seriously, how many times do we have to tell you? Obamacare must die. Kill it dead â€“ with fire!
When are you going to get it through your wonk spheres that we donâ€™t want a government-led health care system that leaves the people who infest D.C. in charge? We donâ€™t need a â€œplanâ€ because 85 percent of us already have a plan â€“ itâ€™s called â€œTaking responsibility for supporting ourselves and our families like damn adults.â€
Yeah, we really mean it when we say we want Obamacare gone. DOA. Kaput. Call it over to the mob bossâ€™s house under the pretense that itâ€™s going to be made, then shoot it through the face so its mother canâ€™t give it an open coffin at the funeral.
Are you feelinâ€™ us now?
Politico: Dems’ final insult: Landrieu crushed: Cassidy trounces incumbent with Republicans set to control 54 Senate seats in the next Congress.