Category Archive 'Ayaan Hirsi Ali'
15 Sep 2014
Hopefully she will be allowed to speak this evening at Yale, but you shouldn’t count on that.
The Muslim Student Association at Yale and 35 other groups signed a letter objecting to Ayan Hirsi Ali being invited to speak at Yale tonight. Truthrevolt.org:
The Muslim Students Association at Yale University has written a letter expressing concern that the William F. Buckley, Jr. Program on campus is hosting womenâ€™s rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali to speak about Islam. The Somali-born Hirsi Ali is an outspoken critic of organized religion, specifically Islam, which was used as justification for genital mutilation and attempting forced marriage.
In an email obtained exclusively by TruthRevolt, Abrar Omeish, an MSA board member, asks for campus organizations to stand against Hirsi Aliâ€™s proposed talk. Hirsi Ali is â€œa speaker who is very well known for her hateful comments towards marginalized groups, especially the Muslim community. It is making many Muslims on campus feel unwelcome and uncomfortable,â€ she wrote.
â€œWe would like to point out though that her main source of fame – or, rather, infamy – has been her inflammatory comments about Islam and its followers. Not only are these comments hateful, but they are also very hurtful to the Muslim community, particularly to Muslim students at Yale,â€ she continued.
Through its efforts, the MSA managed to recruit 35 other campus groups and student organizations to stand against Hirsi Ali’s talk because she “is being invited to speak as an authority on Islam despite the fact that she does not hold the credentials to do so.” Hirsi Ali is scheduled to to give a lecture titled â€œClash of Civilizations: Islam and the Westâ€ on Monday September 15th. …
In the letter, the groups wrote that “The comments Ms. Hirsi Ali has made on Islam have been classified as hate speech and have been considered unprotected libel and slander. She has been condemned for them by national organizations and universities. The Muslim community and its allies are disappointed that our own fellow Yalies would invite such a speaker knowingly and that she would have such a platform in our home.”
Cosigners to the letter include: Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), J Street U, The Arab Students Association (ASA), Womenâ€™s Leadership Initative (WLI), The Womenâ€™s Center, Asian American Student Alliance (AASA), Black Church at Yale (BCAY), The Slifka Center, Council on Middle Eastern Studies (CMES), and the Yale Atheists, Humanists, and Agnostics (AHA).
The Yale Daily News reports that Mr. Omeish and the AMA were demanding to limit the topics Hirsi Ali could address and wanted their own speaker included in the program to rebut her remarks.
[Abrar] Omeish [’17] said that the group and their Islamic values uphold freedom of speech.
â€œThe difference here is that itâ€™s hate speech, [which] under the law would be classified as libel or slander and is not protected by the First Amendment. Thatâ€™s what weâ€™re trying to condemn here.â€
After becoming aware of the Buckley Programâ€™s plan to bring Hirsi Ali to campus, Omeish met with [Buckley Program president Rich] Lizardo [’15] last week to discuss Hirsi Aliâ€™s speaking engagement and the MSAâ€™s requests. According to Omeish, the MSA never intended to disinvite Hirsi Ali, but instead requested the invitation of a second speaker with academic credentials on the subject. The MSA also asked that Hirsi Aliâ€™s speech be limited to her personal experience and professional expertise.
But Lizardo responded that the Buckley Program would not adopt the MSAâ€™s requests and would not change the format or content of the lecture.
David Gelernter (who was persuaded by the Unibomber to become openly conservative) responded yesterday with some nifty sarcasm to the Muslim students’ demands.
Your inspired suggestion, having Official Correctors speak right after Ali to remind students of the authorized view of Muslim society, is the most exciting new development in Free Speech since the Inquisition â€” everyone will be talking about it! You have written, with great restraint, about â€œhow uncomfortable it will beâ€ for your friends if this woman is allowed to speak. Uncomfortable nothing. The genital mutilation of young girls is downright revolting! Who ever authorized this topic in a speech to innocent Yale undergraduates? Next thing you know, people will be saying that some orthodox Muslim societies are the most cruel and benighted on earth and that Western societies are better than they are (better!) merely because they donâ€™t sexually mutilate young girls! Or force them into polygamous marriages, countenance honor killings, treat women as the property of their male relations, and all that. Canâ€™t they give it a rest? Youâ€™d think someone was genitally mutilating them.
We all know that Free Speech doesnâ€™t mean that just anyone can stand up and start spouting. Would you let your dog talk for an hour to a Yale student audience? Whatâ€™s next, inviting Dick Cheney? Careful study of contemporary documents makes it perfectly clear that when the Bill of Rights mentions Free Speech, it is alluding to Freedom of Speech for the Muslim Students Association at Yale. We all know that true free speech means freedom to shut up, especially if you disagree with your betters. And true free thought means freedom to stop thinking as soon as the official truth is announced by the proper Authorities â€” and freedom to wait patiently until then.
Read the whole thing.
12 Jun 2010
Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Mark Steyn tries to make sense of the left’s defense of fundamentalism Islam against the criticism of a female Somali intellectual.
Ayaan Hirsi Aliâ€™s great cause is womenâ€™s liberation. Unfortunately for her, the women she wants to liberate are Muslim, so she gets minimal support and indeed a ton of hostility from Western feminists who have reconciled themselves, consciously or otherwise, to the two-tier sisterhood: when it comes to clitoridectomies, forced marriages, honour killings, etc., multiculturalism trumps feminism. Liberal men are, if anything, even more opposed. She long ago got used to the hectoring TV interviewer, from Avi Lewis on the CBC a while back to Tavis Smiley on PBS just the other day, insisting that say what you like about Islam but everyone knows that Christians are just as backward and violent, if not more so. The media left spends endless hours and most of its interminable awards ceremonies congratulating itself on its courage, on â€œspeaking truth to power,â€ the bravery of dissent and all the rest, but faced with a pro-gay secular black feminist who actually lives it they frost up in nothing flat.
The latest is Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times. Reviewing Ayaanâ€™s new book Nomad, he begins:
â€œShe has managed to outrage more peopleâ€”in some cases to the point that they want to assassinate herâ€”in more languages in more countries on more continents than almost any writer in the world today. Now Hirsi Ali is working on antagonizing even more people in yet another memoir.â€
Thatâ€™s his opening pitch: if there are those who wish to kill her, itâ€™s her fault because sheâ€™s a provocateuse whoâ€™s found a lucrative shtick in â€œworking on antagonizingâ€ people. The Times headlines Kristofâ€™s review â€œThe Gadfly,â€ as if sheâ€™s a less raddled and corpulent Gore Vidal. In fact, she wrote a screenplay for a film; Muslim belligerents threatened to kill her and her director; they made good on one half of that threat. This isnâ€™t shtick.
But Kristof decides to up the condescension. Of the authorâ€™s estrangement from her Somali relatives, he writes: â€œI couldnâ€™t help thinking that perhaps Hirsi Aliâ€™s family is dysfunctional simply because its members never learned to bite their tongues and just say to one another: â€˜I love you.â€™ â€
Awwwww. Group hug! Works every time.
But maybe not so much in Somalia. This isnâ€™t a family where they bite their tongues but where they puncture their clitorises. At the age of five, Ayaan was forced to undergo â€œFGMâ€ (female genital mutilation), or, in the new non-judgmental PC euphemism, â€œcutting.â€ When she had her first period, her mother beat her. When she was 22, her father arranged for her to marry a cousin in Canada. While in Germany awaiting the visa for her wedded bliss in Her Majestyâ€™s multicultural utopia, she decided to skip out, and fled to the Netherlands.
All she wanted was a chance to do what Nicholas Kristof takes for grantedâ€”to live her own life. What difference would saying â€œI love youâ€ in a Lifestyle Channel soft-focus blur accompanied by saccharine strings make? As they see it, the perpetrators of â€œhonour killingsâ€ love their daughters: thatâ€™s why they kill â€™em. Would Kristof wish to swap his options for the set menu served up to Muslim women? How would he like it if, just as he was getting ready to head to Oxford on his Rhodes Scholarship, his dad had announced that heâ€™d arranged for him to marry a cousin? Oh, and in Canada.
Which brings me to my big philosophical difference with Ms. Hirsi Ali: in 2006, she was one of a dozen intellectuals to publish a manifesto against radical Islam and in defence of â€œsecular values for all.â€ Often in her speeches, sheâ€™ll do a heartwarming pitch to all of usâ€”â€œblack, white, gay, straightâ€â€”to stand firm for secular humanism. My problem with this is that, in Europe and elsewhere, liberal secularism is not the solution to the problem but the vacuum in which a resurgent globalized Islam has incubated. …
In a way, the Western leftâ€™s hostility to Ayaan Hirsi Ali makes my point for me. In Terror and Liberalism, Paul Berman wrote that suicide bombings â€œproduced a philosophical crisis, among everyone around the world who wanted to believe that a rational logic governs the world.â€ In other words, it has to be about â€œpovertyâ€ or â€œsocial justiceâ€ because the alternativeâ€”that they want to kill us merely because we are the otherâ€”undermines the hyper-rationalistâ€™s entire world view. Thus, every pro-gay, pro-feminist, pro-black Western liberalâ€™s determination to blame Ayaan Hirsi Ali for the fact that a large number of benighted thuggish halfwits want to kill her. Deploring what he regards as her simplistic view of Islam, Nicholas Kristof rhapsodizes about its many fine qualitiesâ€”â€œThere is also the warm hospitality toward guests, including Christians and Jews.â€ …
As Paul Mirengoff of the Power Line blog observes, traditionally when useful idiots shill for illiberal ideologies it requires at least â€œthe illusion of progressivismâ€ to bring them on board. Islam canâ€™t provide that, but thatâ€™s no obstacle to getting the bien pensants to sign up. As much as anyone, secular leftists want meaning in their lives. But Communism went belly up; the postwar welfare state is bankrupt; environmentalism has taken a hit in recent months; and Christianity gives them the vapours. Nicholas Kristof will not be the first great thinker to talk himself into a view of Islam as this seasonâ€™s version of Richard Gere Buddhism.
At a superficial level, the Islamo-leftist alliance makes no sense: gay feminist secular hedonists making common cause with homophobic misogynist proscriptive theocrats. From Islamâ€™s point of view, itâ€™s an alliance of convenience. But I would bet that more than a few lefties will wind up embracing Islam to one degree or another before weâ€™re done.
Mark Steyn omits consideration of the irresistible leftwing impulse toward treason and the embrace of the cause of the Other, which becomes increasingly passionate and compelling in direct proportion to the evil and/or inferiority of the particular hostile Other. The leftist, in the case of Islam, manages to enjoy the piquant pleasure of combining the sensations of pleasure attendant upon fulfilling the role of society dowager defending the minority footpad from the police with taking another whack at Western Civilization.
Your are browsing
the Archives of Never Yet Melted
in the 'Ayaan Hirsi Ali' Category.