Jonah Goldberg discusses how the base philosophy of American government has changed. We are now ruled by people, like Barack Obama, who believe that they know better than we do ourselves what’s good for us.
Several times now, the president has endeavored to explain that itâ€™s not that big a deal millions of Americans are losing their health-insurance plans against their will. The people who had plans they liked didnâ€™t understand that the plans they liked were no good â€” they were the actuarial equivalent of trans fats, donâ€™t you know? The fact that the people who held them liked them, thought they were good, and wanted to keep them doesnâ€™t count for much, because the government knows best.
The president canâ€™t say it as plainly as he would like, because to do so would be to admit not only that he lied to the American people, but that he thinks the complainers are ignorant about their own needs and interests.
The presidentâ€™s more intellectually honest defenders have said exactly that. â€œVast swathes of policy are based on the correct presumption that people donâ€™t know whatâ€™s best for them. Nothing new,â€ tweeted Josh Barro, politics editor for Business Insider.
Barroâ€™s fairly liberal, but Iâ€™d be dishonest if I said that he was wrong from a conservative perspective. The difference, however, is that conservatives tend to see government as a necessary evil, and therefore see policymaking with some humility. Liberals tend to see government as a necessary good, and see ordering people to do things â€œfor their own goodâ€ as a source of pride, even hubris.
From a conservative perspective, telling people how to run their lives when not absolutely necessary is an abuse of power. For liberals, telling people how to run their lives is one of the really fun perks of working for the government.
You can see the frustration on the presidentâ€™s face. Itâ€™s almost like the ingrates who refuse to understand that his were necessary lies for their own good are spoiling all his fun.