Category Archive 'Rudolph Giuliani'
25 Jan 2018
Billy, the celebrated Rat Killing Dog, London, circa 1823
Peter Ferrara, at the America Spectator, says don’t fire Robert Mueller. Instead, fire and replace his boss with just the right personality.
Now there is one master stroke left for Trump to play to drive the stake through the heart of this attempted fascist coup against America, led today by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, the only barely still functioning corporal in the fascist army.
Muellerâ€™s boss, who originally recommended him for appointment, is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who seems to be at the center of the fascist coup today. Trumpâ€™s essential master stroke would be to fire Rosenstein and appoint Rudy Giuliani as Deputy Attorney General in his place.
Giuliani would then be Muellerâ€™s boss, with first-hand knowledge of whatever Mueller is doing, right or wrong. Giuliani would effectively be a Super Special Counsel, but operating within the Justice Department, in accordance with Americaâ€™s Constitutional framework.
Giuliani knows what laws apply to professionals at the FBI and at Justice. After many years as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, which covers Manhattan, Wall Street, and New York City, he knows how to proceed with preservation and collection of evidence, and prosecution of crimes. Expect an immediate exodus of all the Fascist coup co-conspirators, like cockroaches all scurrying about when the light is turned on in the dark basement downstairs.
Giuliani could also fire and replace Obama/Hillary co-conspirator Christopher Wray, current head of the FBI. Bring in former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom to replace him, a true patriot committed to restoring the integrity of the FBI.
Giuliani would know how to cooperate professionally with Trumpâ€™s appointed AG Jeff Sessions. He would actually be a great aid to AG Sessions, helping him to keep on top of the entire Department. Giuliani would know what materials can and should be released to the public, and how to do it legally.
History would record this one move as the beginning of the end of the fascist coup against America, and of the Trump resistance. The only question left would be what did Obama know, and when did he know it. Giuliani has the background to know how to uncover that as well.
21 Feb 2015
Kevin Williamson responds to the Mainstream Media Palace Guards’ denunciations of Rudy Giuliani’s recent statement at a private dinner that he did not believe Barack Obama loved America.
Questions about patriotism and love of country are, according to our self-appointed referees, out of bounds, dÃ©classÃ©, boob bait for bubbas, etc. Those are questions that we are not allowed to ask in polite society. Why? Because polite society does not want to hear the answers.
Does Barack Obama like America? The people around him certainly seem to have their reservations. Michelle Obama said â€” twice, at separate campaign events â€” that her husbandâ€™s ascending to the presidency meant that â€œfor the first time in my adult lifetime, Iâ€™m really proud of my country.â€ She was in her mid 40s at the time, her â€œadult lifetimeâ€ having spanned decades during which she could not be â€œreally proudâ€ of her country. Barack Obama spent years in the Reverend Jeremiah Wrightâ€™s church as the churchman fulminated: â€œGod Damn America!â€ The Reverend Wrightâ€™s infamous â€œGod Damn America!â€ sermon charges the country with a litany of abuses: slavery, mistreatment of the Indians, â€œtreating citizens as less than human,â€ etc. A less raving version of the same indictment can be found in the presidentâ€™s own speeches and books. His social circle includes such figures as Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, who expressed their love of country by participating in a murderous terrorist campaign against it.
Does Barack Obama love his country? Call me a rube for saying so, but itâ€™s a fair question.
Read the whole thing.
13 Oct 2012
At a New York fundraiser for GOP congressional candidate Dan Halloran, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani blasted President Obama for his leadership failures after the terrorist attacks in Libya.
Giuliani reasserted that Obama was wrong to blame the attacks on the YouTube video and criticized the president for decreasing security at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
â€œThis was for President Obama, I believe, a teaching moment. Because next year, I believe, heâ€™ll be teaching,â€ he joked, as the crowd laughed.
From Jammie via Ed Driscoll.
26 Jan 2008
The Times’ Gail Collins writes Rudy’s epitaph.
Tuesdayâ€™s Florida primary is supposed to be the Giuliani firewall, his explanation for why he kept coming in third or fourth or fifth everywhere else. . . . Many commentators have pointed out â€” really very unkindly â€” that the longer Giuliani stayed in Florida, the lower his standing in the state polls. Perhaps it would have been wiser for him to make his stand in a place where people had barely heard of him.
They say Guam is quite lovely this time of year.
â€œThe reality is we are getting support,â€ said the candidate in answer to the inevitable question. He says â€œthe reality is …â€ very, very often. Almost as often as he says â€œvery, very.â€
Those of us who live in New York found it rather peculiar that Giuliani was a front-runner at all, given his deeply mixed record running the city. Now, the idea that Florida might take him out of the race is somewhat disappointing. Thereâ€™s still so much about him we havenâ€™t yet had a chance to share with the national electorate. Did we ever mention the time he tried to stop the city elections because he didnâ€™t think that New York could get along without him?
Rudy was thrown off his game by the publicâ€™s shift from worrying about terrorism to worrying about the economy, and a dwindling interest in hearing him talk about where he was when the terrorists attacked New York. Heâ€™s tried to rebound by vigorously promoting a national catastrophe fund to reduce the cost of home insurance in hurricane-prone Florida. This is not, in general, an idea that fiscal conservatives cotton to. Itâ€™s so dicey, in fact, that even Mitt Romney has been hesitant about adopting it as a pander-point.
Giuliani has turned hurricanes into natureâ€™s way of saying Al Qaeda. (â€œAll of us are subject to the impact of natural disasters … and of course acts of terrorism, which I remember living through.â€)
Perhaps he can pull it off. Florida is one of those places that makes participating in elections as easy as ordering a drive-thru hamburger. People have been casting their votes for almost two weeks now. Maybe a lot of them voted for Rudy and then were embarrassed to admit it to the pollsters, once they discovered he wasnâ€™t really very popular after all.
Still, his campaign has a definite pall over it, and his many hangers-on have to be wondering whether another pathetic showing here would damage the Rudy brand. Are corporations still going to pay him $100,000 for lecturing about leadership and 9/11 now that they know heâ€™s done it for free on the pool deck at the Rosen Centre Hotel in Orlando and Paisanoâ€™s Gourmet Pizza in Port St. Lucie? (More critically from the minionsâ€™ perspective, are they still going to provide, as the speaking contract requires, â€œfirst-class travel expenses for up to five people?â€)
Are they still going to hire his firm, Giuliani Partners, to do whatever it is Giuliani Partners is supposed to do, now that the glow of hanging out with Americaâ€™s Mayor has faded? Before the terrorist attack, after all, Rudy Giuliani was just a lame-duck mayor with abysmal approval ratings, a tabloidy personal life and uncertain job prospects. What 9/11 has given, 1/29 could taketh away.
Perhaps thatâ€™s why heâ€™s refrained from saying anything unpleasant about any of his competitors in Florida. Mitt Romney and John McCain are torn between trying to go in for the kill and their desire to avoid looking like Barack and Hillary. The best Rudy can do, on the other hand, might be to avoid looking like a future contender on â€œThe Celebrity Apprentice.â€
Hat tip to Stephen Frankel.
05 Jan 2008
The ever-witty Mark Steyn comments on the Republican Winter of our Discontent.
Confronted by Preacher Huckabee standing astride the Iowa caucuses, smirking, “Are you feelin’ Hucky, punk?”, many of my conservative pals are inclined to respond, “Shoot me now.”
But, if that seems a little dramatic, let’s try and rustle up an alternative.
In response to the evangelical tide from the west, New Hampshire primary voters have figured, “Any old crusty, cranky, craggy coot in a storm,” and re-embraced John McCain. After all, Granite State conservatism is not known for its religious fervor: it prefers small government, low taxes, minimal regulation, the freedom to be left alone by the state. So they’re voting for a guy who opposed the Bush tax cuts, and imposed on the nation the most explicit restriction in political speech in years. Better yet, after a freezing first week of January and the snowiest December in a century, New Hampshire conservatives are goo-goo for a fellow who also believes the scariest of global-warming scenarios and all the big-government solutions necessary to avert them.
Well, OK, maybe we can rustle up an alternative to the alternative.
Rudy Giuliani’s team is betting that, after a Huck/McCain seesaw through the early states, Florida voters by Jan. 29 will be ready to unite their party behind a less-divisive figure, if by “less divisive figure” you mean a pro-abortion gun-grabbing cross-dresser. …
Where I part company with Huck’s supporters is in believing he’s any kind of solution. He’s friendlier to the teachers’ unions than any other so-called “cultural conservative” â€“ which is why in New Hampshire he’s the first Republican to be endorsed by the NEA. His health care pitch is Attack Of The Fifty Foot Nanny, beginning with his nationwide smoking ban. This is, as Jonah Goldberg put it, compassionate conservatism on steroids â€“ big paternalistic government that can only enervate even further “our culture.”
So, Iowa chose to reward, on the Democrat side, a proponent of the conventional secular left, and, on the Republican side, a proponent of a new Christian left. If that’s the choice, this is going to be a long election year.
21 Nov 2007
A number of my conservative friends are selling out to Giuliani on the basis of supposed electability. Going outside the conservative fold in hope of electoral success has proven in the past to be a mistake, and would be a mistake again.
My own view is that Giuliani is a lot like Nixon, who, as everyone needs to remember, was an electable compromise who turned into a disaster for Republicans with respect to policy, and who produced a thoroughgoing political debacle as well.
Like Nixon, Giuliani is not conservative. He is merely a statist authoritarian. But Giuliani is even worse than Nixon. He has only very recently become strongly self-identified as Republican at all or made even the slightest pretension towards conservatism. Unlike Nixon, who was at least occasionally allied with Republican conservatives, Giuliani has been an outright enemy of the Republican Right who endorsed the ultra-liberal democrat Mario Cuomo in 1994 rather than support George Pataki (who was back then erroneously believed to be a serious conservative).
It is perfectly obvious that Giuliani’s recent conversions are entirely related to the personal opportunities they offer in 2008, and, were he to be elected, it is very doubtful any of those new commitments would endure as long after the election as the interval that they preceded it. Once in office, Giuliani would have new priorities far more important to him than Republicanism, Conservatism, or keeping faith with people foolish enough to elect him. He would immediately start taking steps to create a personal legacy and secure a second term.
Both goals would be more easily achieved by changing course and (like his non-conservative predecessor Richard Nixon) supporting the key top items on the liberal establishment’s agenda. So expect Rudolf to get right to work on the contemporary equivalent of enacting Affirmative Action, betraying Taiwan, passing the Endangered Species Act (giving the federal government an excuse to preclude private use of any piece of property), and implementing Wage and Price Controls. The more support he can get personally the better for him, so watch for a series of democrat appointments and a major sellout on court appointments.
Can we predict specifics of Rudy’s betrayals? Some of them I think we can.
Giuliani’s equivalent of Nixon’s Affirmative Action will be federalized Gay Marriage. His equivalent of the Endangered Species Act will be the adoption of the Kyoto Treaty and the creation of Carbon Credits. (Al Gore and Kleiner Perkins get very, very rich.) Giuliani’s Wage & Price Controls? Expect hizonner to raise taxes, to go after the Hedge Fund industry, and to revive Anti-Trust. Giuliani will continue from the White House his practice of building personal power by playing the role of class warrior and brutalizing more nouveau and vulnerable economic contestants on behalf of more established sections of the Financial Community. Doubtless, he will also find allies in the tech sector on whose behalf he can break up “monopolies.” With whom Giuliani will make a deal overseas is less clear right now. Perhaps he would preside over the reunification of Taipei with the Mainland and get his own opera.
10 Nov 2007
Matthew J. Frank discusses the interesting question of whether Republicans should trust the former New York mayor’s recent “conversions.”
â€œIsnâ€™t it better that I tell you what I really believe instead of pretending to change all of my positions to fit the prevailing wind?â€
So asked Rudy Giuliani at the â€œValues Voter Summit,â€ on October 20. Itâ€™s a powerful rhetorical question. Simultaneously Giuliani declared that flip-flopping and pandering are beneath him, and intimated that he is superior to his leading rival, Mitt Romney, who is famous for having changed his mind on the subject of abortion rights. Iâ€™m no waffler, no quick-change artist when I face a different constituency, says Rudy. â€œI believe trust is more important than 100% agreement.â€ And so Hizzoner has made trust the currency of his campaign, and he links trust to consistency: Iâ€™m the same guy yesterday, today, tomorrow, and the day after that.
By now you get the picture. Mayor Giulianiâ€™s latter-day assurances on the abortion issue are thin and insubstantial, and appear to be made to endure for just as long as it takes to get the Republican nomination. So far I believe the phrase â€œright to lifeâ€ has never passed his lips, and Iâ€™m not sure it can. Itâ€™s hard to imagine Giuliani as the partyâ€™s nominee even continuing to talk about the abortion issue after he achieves that status, if he could get away with it.
But would he get away with it? Giulianiâ€™s pandering in all directions on this issue, his evident lack of a guiding moral or legal principle on the issue, is tailor-made for attack by Hillary Clintonâ€™s campaign. We can hear her now in a head-to-head debate: â€œWhich is it, mayor? Do your ideal â€˜strict constructionistâ€™ judges strike down a womanâ€™s right to choose, or not? Which do you want to see happen? Where are you on this issue?â€ Does Rudy then betray a career-long support of abortion rights â€” or the platform of his party â€” or stick bumptiously to his well-rehearsed mantra of â€œdonâ€™t-care strict constructionismâ€? Surely the Democrats are already relishing the opportunity theyâ€™ll have to make him dance even faster.
Why do we worry about the flip-flopper or the panderer in political campaigns? Because we wonder whom to trust, to be sure. But also because we want our own partyâ€™s candidates to be as invulnerable as possible to attack by the opposition party. A lot of pro-lifers want desperately to trust Rudy Giuliani, and are willing to put the fate of the right-to-life cause in his hands because they believe heâ€™s the man who can beat Hillary Clinton. But even if that trust is wisely given (a big if indeed), on this issue, compared to almost anyone else in the GOP field â€” Mitt Romney most certainly included â€” Rudy Giuliani is the most vulnerable candidate the Republicans could make their standard-bearer.
I don’t myself care much about the abortion issue. (I’m not really planning on having any personally.) But I care a great deal about Gun Control, on which issue Giuliani’s record is utterly abysmal, and Hizzoner’s recent supposed conversion on the subject does not impress me in the least. If they nominate Giuliani, I’ll be voting Third Party.
05 Nov 2007
Nick Rivera debunks Hizzoner’s campaign narrative.
Itâ€™s among the most well-known and often-implemented strategies in the universe of presidential politics: appeal to the partyâ€™s base during the primaries and tack back towards the center during the run-up to the general election. This process doesnâ€™t necessarily dictate that the presidential candidate â€œflip-flopâ€ on any of his or her positions. He or she merely emphasizes one set of policies for the partisans who will be voting in the presidential primaries and then, several months later, emphasizes a different set of policies for the American electorate at large.
However, in recent years, a somewhat different tactic has emerged as a favorite among presidential candidates: the art of flip-flopping by presidential candidates who staked out positions that were popular when running for statewide office but became politically inconvenient when faced with appealing to the party base in the run up to presidential primaries. …
In yet another example of a politician advocating one position while running for state or local office and a completely different one upon running for president, Rudy Giuliani has decided that he now supports a very strict interpretation of the Second Amendment. While Giulianiâ€™s critics have been quick to point out Giulianiâ€™s sudden change of heart with regards to gun control, Giulianiâ€™s defenders have argued that Giulianiâ€™s positions are consistent with the principle of federalismâ€”arguing that while he may have supported strict gun control laws for New York City, he believes that individual states have the right to reject such gun control laws.
Unfortunately for Giuliani and his supporters, Giulianiâ€™s current â€œfederalistâ€ interpretation of the Second Amendment directly contradicts his gun control record as mayor of New York…
Read the whole thing.
27 Oct 2007
Pat Buchanan on Giuliani.
A McGovernite in 1972, he boasted in the campaign of 1993 that he would “rekindle the Rockefeller, Javits, Lefkowitz tradition” of New York’s GOP and “produce the kind of change New York City saw with … John Lindsay.” He ran on the Liberal Party line and supported Mario Cuomo in 1994.
Pro-abortion, anti-gun, again and again he strutted up Fifth Avenue in the June Gay Pride parade and turned the Big Apple into a sanctuary city for illegal aliens. While Ward Connerly goes state to state to end reverse discrimination, Rudy is an affirmative-action man.
Gravitating now to Rudy’s camp are those inveterate opportunists, the neocons, who see in Giuliani their last hope of redemption for their cakewalk war and their best hope for a “Long War” against “Islamo-fascism.”
I will, Rudy promises, nominate Scalias. Only one more may be needed to overturn Roe. And I will keep Hillary out of the White House.
A Giuliani presidency would represent the return and final triumph of the Republicanism that conservatives went into politics to purge from power. A Giuliani presidency would represent repudiation by the party of the moral, social and cultural content that, with anti-communism, once separated it from liberal Democrats and defined it as an institution.
Rudy offers the right the ultimate Faustian bargain: retention of power at the price of one’s soul.
10 Oct 2007
Stephen Green summarizes at PJM:
When asked point-blank if heâ€™d support the Republican nominee next fall, (Ron) Paul answered just as Grosse Pointe-blankly: â€œNo.â€ Unless the party retreats from Iraq â€“ and Germany and Korea and Japan, too â€“ then Paul wants nothing to do with the Republicans. That said, Paul should stick to his principles and RSVP â€œthanks but no thanksâ€ to the next debate, and the one after that, and so on. If heâ€™s not even going to pretend to be a Republican, he ought to go back to the Libertarian Party where he and his five million dollars would be more than welcome. In the meantime, heâ€™s just taking up space, time, and a whole lot of hot air.
Thompsonâ€™s performance was much more low-key than Paulâ€™s, which is like saying that napping tree sloth is somewhat calmer than a spider monkey hopped up on Mountain Dew and herbal Viagra. Over the course of a two hour debate, I caught Thompson mentioning exactly one hard fact â€“ Israelâ€™s air strike on Iraqâ€™s Osirak nuclear plant, way back in 1981. The rest of the time, Thompson spoke in platitudes, slowly, and yet still stumbled through some of his answers. The good news, if you can call it that, is the expectations game. After a month of dismal campaigning, Fred looked pretty good just showing up fully dressed and speaking in complete sentences. …
Really, todayâ€™s debate was the Mitt & Rudy Show. Romney and Giuliani were offered more questions than any other three or four candidates, and neither of them made any major flubs. There was one telling moment, however, just minutes before the end of the debate. CNBCâ€™s Maria Bartiromo asked Giuliani if London would ever replace New York â€œas the worldâ€™s financial capital.â€ As I wrote on my blog, live during the debate, â€œRudy basically gave her the New Yorker Single Finger Salute.â€ Ainâ€™t nobody bigger â€™an New Yawk, lady. When asked the same question a moment later, Romney gave a canned answer, which included mention of some obscure provision of the impenetrable Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
You have to give this debate to Rudy on points and style, and hope that the real Fred Thompson shows up at the next one â€“ if ever.
I watched the first hour. Thompson seemed surprisingly nervous and unprepared to me. He also looked unwell. He kept his head bent forward in a perpetual stoop, as if he had to minimize his height to get into the angle of the camera, and he looked drawn and cadaverous.
The Romney-Giuliani exchange was telling, and left a little blood in the water. Giuliani boasted he cut taxes 23 times as New York mayor, and Romney nailed him by noting that it was hizzoner who sued all the way to the Supreme Court to kill the presidential line-item veto. Giuliani scuttled to hide under the protection of the Constitution, claiming it was only what a strict constructionist like himself had to do. A few moments later, he admitted that retaining NYC’s share of federal pork had also motivated him.
I did not even initially recognize second-tier candidates like Brownback, Tancredo, Huckabee, and Hunter, and I was surprised by how articulate and comparatively substantive all of them were. Brownback and Huckabee distinctly increased my interest and respect. But, unfortunately, the way US politics operates, with our dimbulb celebrity-culture media functioning as the filter between reality and the voting public, however meritorious any second-tier candidate might be, unless he starts dating Paris Hilton, he is just not going to get the attention needed to compete effectively.
Ron Paul was also an effective speaker, but I doubt that his economic prescriptions (which implicitly demanded a return to the Gold Standard) or his foreign policy of isolationist pacifism are going to win him a lot of support.
Thompson survived, but his performance can only have disappointed and alarmed those of us hoping he’d provide a conservative electoral choice. Fortunately, only journalists, bloggers, and the rest of an infinitesimal minority of intensely political Americans were watching. He still has lots of time to get into shape and improve.
07 Oct 2007
The DesMoines Register reports:
Mitt Romney still leads in Iowa but Fred Thompson, a relative newcomer to the presidential race, has emerged as his nearest competitor in a new Des Moines Register poll of likely Republican caucus participants.
Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani are in a close fight for third place in the Iowa Poll taken over three days last week.
It’s early October, Thompson is moving up in the polls, and Manhattan’s vest pocket Mussolini is doing about as well as an obscure governor of Arkansas. Not bad.
Your are browsing
the Archives of Never Yet Melted
in the 'Rudolph Giuliani' Category.